Fazio et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 49

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/6/2015 re Notice of Related Case ORDERING that this action will not be reassigned because it has not been shown that re-assignment is likely to effect a substantial saving of judicial effort. (Donati, J)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8

MICHAEL A. FAZIO, and KIM
MARIE FAZIO,
Plaintiffs,

9
v.

10
11
12
13

No.

2:14-cv-00538-GEB-KJN

ORDER

WASHINGTON MUTUAL FA FEDERAL
DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION, JP MORGAN CHASE
NA, MTC FINANCIAL INC DBA
TRUSTEE CORPOS, and DOES 1100 and Roes 1-30,

14

Defendants.

15
16

MICHAEL A. FAZIO, and
KIM MARIE FAZIO,

17

20
21
22

2:14-cv-02574-TLD-KJN

Plaintiffs,

18
19

No.

v.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
CORPORATION; JPMORGAN CHASE
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;
MTC FINANCIAL, DBA TRUSTEE
CORPS; JOSEPH V. QUATTROCCHI,
and Does 1-100,
Defendants.

23
24

The “Amended Notice Concerning Related Cases” regarding

25
26

the

above-captioned

actions,

filed

27

Notice, ECF No. 35), has been considered.

28

the claims in the later-filed action, that action will not be re1

December

23,

2014,

(Am.

However, in light of

1

assigned because it has not been shown that re-assignment is

2

likely to effect a substantial saving of judicial effort.

3

Dated:

January 6, 2015

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2