Weiner v. Ocwen Financial Corporation, et al

Filing 114

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/12/18, ORDERING that #106 Amended Motion to Compel hearing is CONTINUED to 3/9/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. On or before 3/2/2018, the parties shall file a joint statement that complies with the Local Rules and the undersigned's Standard Information. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

DAVID WEINER, individually and on
behalf of other members of the public
similarly situated,

13

Plaintiff,

14
15
16

No. 2:14-cv-2597 MCE DB

ORDER

v.
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
a Florida corporation, et al.,

17

Defendants.

18
On January 8, 2018, plaintiff filed an amended motion to compel. (ECF No. 106.) The

19
20

motion is noticed for hearing before the undersigned on February 16, 2018. On February 9, 2018,

21

the parties’ filed a joint statement re discovery disagreement. (ECF No. 113.) The parties’ joint

22

statement consists of thirty pages, excluding exhibits. Joint statements filed before the

23

undersigned shall not exceed twenty-five pages, excluding exhibits, as explained in the

24

undersigned’s Standard Information re discovery disputes set forth on the court’s web page.1 See

25

http://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/judges/all-judges/united-states-magistrate-

26

judge-deborah-barnes-db

27
28

1

Only exhibits are excluded from the twenty-five page limit. Pages such as the title page, table
of contents, or signature page count toward the twenty-five page limit.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The February 16, 2018 hearing of plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 106) is

3

continued to Friday, March 9, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I

4

Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned; and

5

2. On or before March 2, 2018, the parties shall file a joint statement that complies with

6

the Local Rules and the undersigned’s Standard Information.2

7

Dated: February 12, 2018

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.civil\weiner2597.pl.cont.hrg.ord

23
24
25
2

26
27
28

The parties’ joint statement asks that “the Court enter a Scheduling Order establishing deadlines
for the collection of ESI, the beginning of document production, and the substantial completion of
document production, in addition to establishing a discovery cut-off.” (ECF No. 113 at 27.) The
parties’ are advised that the undersigned may not set a schedule in this action and all such
requests must be made to the assigned District Judge.
2