Saelee et al v. BSI Financial Services et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/22/14. The hearing on the 9 MOTION to DISMISS is reset for 3/11/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KAO SAELEE, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-2625-TLN-AC
v.
ORDER
BSI FIN. SERVS., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Both plaintiffs in this case are proceeding pro se. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF
17
18
No. 9) is currently on the court’s Law & Motion calendar for February 18, 2015. However, the
19
court’s most recent order (ECF No. 10) was returned as undeliverable to both plaintiffs. It thus
20
appears that plaintiffs have failed to keep the court advised of their current address, although
21
required to do so by E.D. Cal. R. 183(b) (authorizing dismissal for lack of prosecution if the
22
address is not updated within 63 days).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on defendants’ motion is
23
24
CONTINUED to March 11, 2015, giving plaintiffs additional time to update the court with their
25
address, and also to file an opposition, or a statement of no opposition, to defendants’ motion.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Plaintiffs are cautioned that failure to comply with the local rules, including Rule 183(b), or to
2
timely respond to the motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this case be
3
dismissed for lack of prosecution.
4
DATED: December 22, 2014
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?