Saelee et al v. BSI Financial Services et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/22/14. The hearing on the 9 MOTION to DISMISS is reset for 3/11/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAO SAELEE, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2625-TLN-AC v. ORDER BSI FIN. SERVS., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Both plaintiffs in this case are proceeding pro se. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF 17 18 No. 9) is currently on the court’s Law & Motion calendar for February 18, 2015. However, the 19 court’s most recent order (ECF No. 10) was returned as undeliverable to both plaintiffs. It thus 20 appears that plaintiffs have failed to keep the court advised of their current address, although 21 required to do so by E.D. Cal. R. 183(b) (authorizing dismissal for lack of prosecution if the 22 address is not updated within 63 days). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on defendants’ motion is 23 24 CONTINUED to March 11, 2015, giving plaintiffs additional time to update the court with their 25 address, and also to file an opposition, or a statement of no opposition, to defendants’ motion. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Plaintiffs are cautioned that failure to comply with the local rules, including Rule 183(b), or to 2 timely respond to the motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this case be 3 dismissed for lack of prosecution. 4 DATED: December 22, 2014 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?