Swenson v. Amtrak
Filing
5
STIPULATION and ORDER 4 for extension of time signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/13/2015. Defendant Amtrak's (National Railroad Passenger Corporation's) time to respond is EXTENDED up to and including 30 days from date of this Order. Plaintiff will file an Amended Complaint within 30 days of Order. Defendant will respond to Amended Complaint within 30 days of service of said document. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THERESE M. SWENSON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
AMTRAK,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
20
21
Case No.:
2:14-CV-2629-KJM-CMK
(PS)
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO
EXTEND DEFENDANT NATIONAL
RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
Date of Filing Action: May 6, 2014
Trial Date: None
_______________________________________)
THE COURT, having reviewed and approved the Stipulation to Extend
22
23
Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation’s Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint,
24
orders as follows:
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
G:\Redding\DOCS\2. Orders to be Processed\14cv2629 -- Stipulated order extending time.wpd
1
2
3
IT IS ORDERED THAT the Stipulation to Extend Defendant National Railroad
Passenger Corporation’s Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is approved as follows:
1)
4
Defendant has an extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s complaint, up to and
including, 30 days from the date of this order;
5
2)
Plaintiff will file an amended complaint within 30 days of this order; and
6
3)
Defendant will respond to amended complaint within 30 days of service of the
7
8
amended complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
12
13
DATED: January 13, 2015
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
G:\Redding\DOCS\2. Orders to be Processed\14cv2629 -- Stipulated order extending time.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?