Swenson v. Amtrak
Filing
57
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/4/16: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/20/2017. Discovery due by 10/6/2017. Dispositive Motions shall be heard no later than 1/12/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/11/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Bench Trial set for 7/23/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
THERESE M. SWENSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:14-CV-02629 KJM CMK
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORP.,
ORDER
Defendant.
16
17
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on July 29, 2016. Barbara
18
19
Norman appeared for plaintiff; Michael Murphy appeared for defendant.
20
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on July 25, 2016, and
21
discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following
22
orders:
23
I.
SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without
24
25
leave of court, good cause having been shown.
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
II.
ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
2
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without
3
leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth
4
Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
5
III.
JURISDICTION/VENUE
6
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Jurisdiction and venue are not
7
disputed.
8
IV.
9
DISCOVERY
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) have been
10
completed. All discovery shall be completed by October 6, 2017. In this context, “completed”
11
means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and
12
any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and,
13
where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery
14
must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court.
15
While the assigned magistrate judge reviews proposed discovery phase protective orders, requests
16
to seal or redact are decided by Judge Mueller as discussed in more detail below. In addition,
17
while the assigned magistrate judge handles discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot
18
change the schedule set in this order, even in connection with a discovery matter.
19
V.
20
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other
21
parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial
22
not later than October 20, 2017. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report
23
prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).
24
By November 10, 2017, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a
25
supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an
26
expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation
27
has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation
28
/////
2
1
shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated
2
above.
3
Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all
4
likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert
5
witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering
6
the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably
7
anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were
8
promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made
9
available for deposition.
10
For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used
11
at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which
12
include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert
13
opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the
14
case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert
15
for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,
16
retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the
17
express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state
18
in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.
19
All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render
20
an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and
21
complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted
22
to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition
23
taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by December 8, 2017.
24
VI.
25
26
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining
orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than January 12, 2018.1 The
27
28
1
Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
3
1
parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s
2
website.
3
4
All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:
5
(a)
The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and
6
(b)
When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the
7
opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.
8
Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to
9
the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,
10
11
652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).
The court values the importance of training young attorneys. The parties are
12
encouraged to consider assigning oral argument to a young attorney. If a written request for oral
13
argument is filed before a hearing, stating an attorney of four or fewer years out of law school
14
will argue the oral argument, then the court will ordinarily hold the hearing, although the court’s
15
schedule and calendar may require the hearing to be reset. Otherwise, the court may find it
16
appropriate in some actions to submit a motion without oral argument.
17
The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty
18
(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases
19
must be made in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion.
20
Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,
21
counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the
22
contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate
23
the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party
24
considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel
25
should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for
26
summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution
27
by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during
28
the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the
4
1
motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and
2
confer efforts.
3
The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
4
have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off
5
date may constitute waiver of such issue.
6
VII.
7
SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the
8
prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the
9
record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be
10
directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be
11
governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the
12
discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the
13
public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of
14
sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has
15
identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the
16
opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of
17
sealing or redaction from the court.
18
VIII.
19
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The Final Pretrial Conference is set for May 11, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. At least one
20
of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial
21
Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable to
22
attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the
23
case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client.
24
Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final
25
Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of
26
witnesses for oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference
27
statement by June 1, 2018. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the
28
/////
5
1
matters to be included in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in Local
2
Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with the following:
3
4
5
- A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously
tendered to the court and its resolution.
- A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim.
6
Disputed core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not to
7
identify every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of
8
each claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered.
9
Where the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core
10
11
disputed facts in the above manner.
- Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s
12
motion in limine, and whether the parties believe resolution of any of these motions will be
13
necessary before the first day of trial.
14
- Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal basis or theory
15
underlying their claims and defenses. Points of law should reflect issues derived from the core
16
undisputed and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument with any point of law; the
17
parties may include concise arguments in their trial briefs.
18
19
20
Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include
documents to be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal.
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to
21
attach to the Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they
22
propose to offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief
23
statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each
24
party may file separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial
25
Conference Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to
26
the Final Pretrial Order.
27
28
Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed
alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for
6
1
plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be
2
marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds “ZZ” exhibits shall be
3
then listed as AAA, BBB, CCC etc. All multi-page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened
4
together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not include
5
excerpts of depositions to be used only for impeachment. In the event that plaintiff(s) and
6
defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation
7
the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that
8
all concerned will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a number and a letter.
9
The parties are encouraged to consult concerning exhibits and, to the extent possible, provide
10
joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and listed numerically, e.g., JX-1, JX-2.
11
The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of
12
witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the
13
standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a
14
party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.
15
16
Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy,
no later than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial.
17
18
Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds
for sanctions.
19
The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of
20
Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the
21
formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b)
22
the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof
23
and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial Conference
24
Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these aims in mind.2
25
A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include monetary
26
2
27
28
“If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the undisputed
facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may summarily dispose
of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm., 770 F.2d 866, 86869 (9th Cir. 1985).
7
1
sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as
2
the court deems appropriate.
3
Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement,
4
counsel shall submit to chambers the word processable version of the Statement, in its entirety
5
(including the witness and exhibit lists) to: kjmorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
6
IX.
MOTIONS IN LIMINE
7
All motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial statement.
8
In most cases, motions in limine are addressed and resolved on the morning of the first day of
9
trial. As noted above, the parties may alert the court at the final pretrial conference and in their
10
final pretrial statement that a particular motion or motions should be resolved earlier. At the final
11
pretrial conference, the court will then set a briefing and hearing schedule on these motions in
12
limine as necessary.
13
The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device
14
designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon
15
dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions
16
in limine.
17
X.
18
TRIAL SETTING
The bench trial is set for July 23, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. Trial briefs are due by July 9,
19
2018.
20
XI.
21
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
The court discussed referral to court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Panel
22
(VDRP) with the parties, however, it appears a scheduling conference is set before Magistrate
23
Judge Edmund F. Brennan for September 8, 2016. If the parties are unsuccessful in their
24
settlement efforts before Magistrate Brennan, referral to the court’s VDRP remains available. In
25
the event referral is requested, the parties shall file said request jointly, in writing. All parties
26
should be prepared to advise the court whether they will stipulate to the trial judge acting as
27
settlement judge and waive disqualification by virtue thereof.
28
/////
8
1
Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at
2
any Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. Each judge
3
has different requirements for the submission of settlement conference statements; the appropriate
4
instructions will be sent to you after the settlement judge is assigned.
5
XII.
MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
6
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
7
Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court
8
upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation alone does not
9
constitute good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or
10
counsel does not constitute good cause.
11
The assigned magistrate judge is authorized to modify only the discovery dates
12
shown above to the extent any such modification does not impact the balance of the schedule of
13
the case.
14
XIII.
15
16
17
18
OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless
objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 4, 2016
19
20
21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?