Lewis v. Unknown
Filing
8
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/5/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MYLVIN OTIS LEWIS,
12
No. 2:14-cv-2643 JAM CKD P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
J. LIZARRAGA,
15
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Respondent.
16
By an order filed November 18, 2014 petitioner was ordered to file a request to proceed in
17
18
forma pauperis, or pay the filing fee, within thirty days. The thirty day period has now expired,
19
and petitioner has not complied with the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
20
RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
21
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
22
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
23
after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written
24
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
25
Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
2
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: January 5, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
lewi2643.fifp
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?