Edwards v. County of Modoc et al
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/20/15 re: 14 ORDERING and APPROVING the hearing on 12 Motion to Strike currently set for 5/28/15 at 2:00 is hereby CONTINUED to be heard on 6/25/15 at 2:00 p.m. in courtroom No. 7. Motion Hearing RESET for 6/25/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr. (Meuleman, A)
1
LAW OFFICE OF
JAMES A. WYATT
3575 SUNSET DRIVE (96001)
POST OFFICE BOX 992338
REDDING, CA 96099-2338
(530) 244-6060
2
3
(530) 244-6069 Facsimile
4
5
6
7
STATE BAR NO. 081128
ALLISON and DEBBIE ALLISON
Attorney for Defendants
COUNTY OF MODOC, MODOC COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT;
BILLY HOLSHOUSER AND MIKE POINDEXTER
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
---oo0oo---
12
TYLER EDWARDS,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
v.
COUNTY OF MODOC, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02646-MCEKJN
PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
STRIKE DEFENDANTS’
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND
ORDER THEREON
19
20
21
STIPULATION
22
COME NOW the parties herein, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through
23
their respective counsels of record, EUGENE B. CHITTOCK for the Plaintiff and
24
JAMES A. WYATT for the Defendants, and hereby stipulate as follows:
25
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff set his hearing on his Motion to Strike Defendants’
26
27
28
LAW OFFICE OF
JAMES A. WYATT
P. O. BOX 992338 29
REDDING, CA 96099-2338
(530) 244-6060
30
31
1
Stipulation and Order to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses 2:14-CV-02646-MCE-KJN
1
Affirmative Defenses to be heard on May 28, 2015, at 2:00 pm, in Courtroom 7 of
2
the Federal Courthouse located in Sacramento, California;
3
WHEREFORE, prior to counsel for plaintiff selecting May 28, 2015, as the
4
noticed hearing date, counsel for defendants had committed to be outside the
5
country starting May 14, 2015 through June 1, 2015, as a result of a paid vacation;
6
WHEREFORE, counsel for plaintiff did not clear the proposed hearing date
7
of May 28, 2015, with counsel for defendants before noticing his motion for that
8
date;
9
10
11
12
WHEREFORE, Defendants intend on filing a response to Plaintiff’s Motion
to Strike on or before May 14, 2015; and
WHEREFORE, Defendants requested Plaintiff continue the hearing to
anytime after June 2, 2015, and Plaintiff has agreed.
13
NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants, by and through their
14
respective counsels of record, hereby agree and do stipulate that the hearing
15
currently set for May 28, 2015, at 2:00 pm in Courtroom 7, to hear Plaintiff’s
16
Motion to Strike Defendants’ Affirmative Defenses, be continued to June 25, 2015,
17
at 2:00 pm, or at any later time selected by the Court, in Courtroom 7, before the
18
Honorable Morrison C. England.
19
DATED: April 8, 2015
LAW OFFICE OF JAMES A. WYATT
20
21
_____/S/ James A. Wyatt____________
JAMES A. WYATT
Attorney for Defendants
22
23
24
25
DATED: April 8, 2015
LAW OFFICE OF EUGENE B. CHITTOCK
26
27
28
LAW OFFICE OF
JAMES A. WYATT
P. O. BOX 992338 29
REDDING, CA 96099-2338
(530) 244-6060
30
31
2
Stipulation and Order to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses 2:14-CV-02646-MCE-KJN
1
_____/S/ Eugene B. Chittock____________
EUGENE B. CHITTOCK
Attorney for Plaintiff
2
3
4
ORDER
5
UPON consideration and good cause appearing therefore, the above
6
Stipulation of the parties to this action is approved. The hearing currently set for
7
May 28, 2015 at 2:00, is hereby continued to be heard on June 25, 2015 at 2:00 pm
8
in Courtroom No. 7.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 20, 2015
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICE OF
JAMES A. WYATT
P. O. BOX 992338 29
REDDING, CA 96099-2338
(530) 244-6060
30
31
3
Stipulation and Order to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses 2:14-CV-02646-MCE-KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?