Raley v. Williams et al
Filing
35
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/24/2019 REVOKING plaintiff's in forma pauperis status. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro Se Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (cc: USCA) (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
STEPHEN RALEY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-CV-2652-JAM-DMC-P
v.
ORDER
BOB WILLIAMS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Final judgment was entered on July 11, 2019, and plaintiff has appealed. The
19
matter was referred to the undersigned by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to certify whether in
20
forma pauperis status should continue on appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad
21
faith, in which case in forma pauperis status would be revoked. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see
22
also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). Having reviewed the
23
entire file, the court concludes in forma pauperis status should be revoked because there is no
24
merit to plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive fines claim.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should be revoked; and
3
2.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro
4
Se Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
5
DATED: September 24, 2019
6
7
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?