Emerton v. Clean Harbors, Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/26/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's 6/4/15 motion to compel 17 is denied without prejudice in light of defendant's supplemental production and responses to discovery propounded. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LAURA EMERTON,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-2658 TLN DAD

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CLEAN HARBORS, INC.,
Defendant.

16
17

On June 26, 2015, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of plaintiff’s

18

motion to compel. Attorney Michele Jackson appeared telephonically on behalf of the plaintiff

19

and attorney Victoria Tallman appeared telephonically on behalf of the defendant.

20

Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set

21

forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 4, 2015

22

motion to compel (Dkt. No. 17) is denied without prejudice in light of defendant’s supplemental

23

production and responses to discovery propounded.

24

Dated: June 26, 2015

25
26
27

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.civil\emerton2658.oah.062615.docx

28
1