Emerton v. Clean Harbors, Inc.
Filing
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/30/2015 DIRECTING the plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint within seven (7) days. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DAVID YEREMIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
David H. Yeremian (SBN 226337)
david@yeremianlaw.com
Michele Jackson (SBN 209841)
Michele@yeremianlaw.com
535 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 705
Glendale, California 91436
Telephone: (818) 230-8380
Facsimile: (818) 230-0308
Attorneys for Plaintiff LAURA EMERTON
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Sarah R. Nichols, CA Bar No. 233099
sarah.nichols@ogletreedeakins.com
Victoria L. Tallman, CA Bar No. 273252
victoria.tallman@ogletreedeakins.com
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: 415.442.4810
Facsimile: 415.442.4870
Attorneys for Defendant CLEAN HARBORS
INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
LAURA EMERTON, an individual,
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff,
v.
CLEAN HARBORS, INC., a
California Corporation; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendant.
Case No.: 2:14-cv-02658-TLN-DAD
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO
ADD CLEAN HARBORS
INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. AS A
DEFENDANT
Trial Date: October 3, 2016
24
First Amended Complaint Filed:
25
March 9, 2015
26
27
28
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO
ADD CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. AS A DEFENDANT
1
Plaintiff Laura Emerton (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Clean Harbors Industrial
2
Services, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby
3
stipulate as follows:
STIPULATION
4
5
A.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff originally named Clean Harbors, Inc. as the
6
defendant in this action, filed in Solano County Superior Court on October 3, 2014,
7
Case No. FCS044304;
8
B.
WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant promptly informed counsel for
9
Plaintiff that the appropriate entity in this action is not Clean Harbors, Inc., but
10
rather is Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. and timely filed an Answer on
11
behalf of Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. in Solano County Superior Court
12
on November 12, 2014, identifying that Defendant was “erroneously sued as Clean
13
Harbors, Inc.”;
14
C.
WHEREAS, Defendant timely removed the matter to the U.S. District
15
Court for the Northern District of California on November 13, 2014, based on
16
diversity jurisdiction;
17
D.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (hereinafter
18
“FAC”), which is the operative pleading in this action, on March 9, 2015, again
19
naming only Clean Harbors, Inc. as a defendant;
20
E.
WHEREAS, Defendant Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc.
21
answered the FAC on March 26, 2015, and again indicated that Defendant was
22
incorrectly sued as Clean Harbors, Inc.;
23
F.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel represented that she would substitute
24
in Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc., if Defendant provided Plaintiff’s counsel
25
with a declaration establishing Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. as the
26
Plaintiff’s employer;
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO
ADD CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. AS A DEFENDANT
1
G.
WHEREAS on June 11, 2015, Defendant provided a declaration from
2
Robert Edwards, the U.S. Payroll Manager for Clean Harbors Environmental
3
Services, Inc. establishing that Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. is Plaintiff’s
4
former employer during the relevant timeframe and therefore the correct defendant
5
in this action;
6
H.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff now seeks to make an amendment to the FAC to
7
add Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. as a defendant in this action, pursuant to
8
the information provided by Robert Edwards;
9
I.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff believes that the documents produced by Clean
10
Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. indicate that Clean Harbors, Inc. was also an
11
employer of the Plaintiff and controlled and maintained the policies and procedures
12
giving rise to the claims and contributed to the wrongful conduct alleged by
13
Plaintiff in the FAC -- which assertions Defendant denies in their entirety --
14
Plaintiff does not wish to remove Clean Harbors, Inc. as a defendant in this action,
15
but wishes to proceed against both Clean Harbors, Inc. and Clean Harbors
16
Industrial Services, Inc.
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
18
1. Plaintiff may amend her Complaint to add Clean Harbors Industrial
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Services, Inc. as a Defendant in this action.
2. Plaintiff is directed to file the amended complaint within seven (7)
days of the entry of this order.
DATED: September 30, 2015
DAVID YEREMIAN & ASSOCIATES,
INC.
By /s/Michele Jackson
David Yeremian
Michele L. Jackson
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LAURA EMERTON
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO
ADD CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. AS A DEFENDANT
1
DATED: September 30, 2015
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
2
3
By:
4
5
6
7
/s/Victoria L. Tallman
Sarah R. Nichols
Victoria L. Tallman
Attorneys for Defendant
CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL
SERVICES, INC. (erroneously sued as Clean
Harbors, Inc.)
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO
ADD CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. AS A DEFENDANT
ORDER
1
2
3
The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause
appearing therefore:
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff, LAURA EMERTON is granted
5
leave to amend her Complaint to add Defendant Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc.
6
as a defendant in this action. Plaintiff is directed to file the amended complaint
7
within seven (7) days of the entry of this order.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
13
Dated: September 30, 2015
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO
ADD CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. AS A DEFENDANT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?