Emerton v. Clean Harbors, Inc.

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/30/2015 DIRECTING the plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint within seven (7) days. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DAVID YEREMIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. David H. Yeremian (SBN 226337) david@yeremianlaw.com Michele Jackson (SBN 209841) Michele@yeremianlaw.com 535 North Brand Boulevard, Suite 705 Glendale, California 91436 Telephone: (818) 230-8380 Facsimile: (818) 230-0308 Attorneys for Plaintiff LAURA EMERTON 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Sarah R. Nichols, CA Bar No. 233099 sarah.nichols@ogletreedeakins.com Victoria L. Tallman, CA Bar No. 273252 victoria.tallman@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.442.4810 Facsimile: 415.442.4870 Attorneys for Defendant CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 LAURA EMERTON, an individual, 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, v. CLEAN HARBORS, INC., a California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendant. Case No.: 2:14-cv-02658-TLN-DAD STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. AS A DEFENDANT Trial Date: October 3, 2016 24 First Amended Complaint Filed: 25 March 9, 2015 26 27 28 -1STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. AS A DEFENDANT 1 Plaintiff Laura Emerton (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Clean Harbors Industrial 2 Services, Inc. (“Defendant”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby 3 stipulate as follows: STIPULATION 4 5 A. WHEREAS, Plaintiff originally named Clean Harbors, Inc. as the 6 defendant in this action, filed in Solano County Superior Court on October 3, 2014, 7 Case No. FCS044304; 8 B. WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant promptly informed counsel for 9 Plaintiff that the appropriate entity in this action is not Clean Harbors, Inc., but 10 rather is Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. and timely filed an Answer on 11 behalf of Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. in Solano County Superior Court 12 on November 12, 2014, identifying that Defendant was “erroneously sued as Clean 13 Harbors, Inc.”; 14 C. WHEREAS, Defendant timely removed the matter to the U.S. District 15 Court for the Northern District of California on November 13, 2014, based on 16 diversity jurisdiction; 17 D. WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (hereinafter 18 “FAC”), which is the operative pleading in this action, on March 9, 2015, again 19 naming only Clean Harbors, Inc. as a defendant; 20 E. WHEREAS, Defendant Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. 21 answered the FAC on March 26, 2015, and again indicated that Defendant was 22 incorrectly sued as Clean Harbors, Inc.; 23 F. WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel represented that she would substitute 24 in Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc., if Defendant provided Plaintiff’s counsel 25 with a declaration establishing Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. as the 26 Plaintiff’s employer; 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. AS A DEFENDANT 1 G. WHEREAS on June 11, 2015, Defendant provided a declaration from 2 Robert Edwards, the U.S. Payroll Manager for Clean Harbors Environmental 3 Services, Inc. establishing that Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. is Plaintiff’s 4 former employer during the relevant timeframe and therefore the correct defendant 5 in this action; 6 H. WHEREAS, Plaintiff now seeks to make an amendment to the FAC to 7 add Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. as a defendant in this action, pursuant to 8 the information provided by Robert Edwards; 9 I. WHEREAS, Plaintiff believes that the documents produced by Clean 10 Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. indicate that Clean Harbors, Inc. was also an 11 employer of the Plaintiff and controlled and maintained the policies and procedures 12 giving rise to the claims and contributed to the wrongful conduct alleged by 13 Plaintiff in the FAC -- which assertions Defendant denies in their entirety -- 14 Plaintiff does not wish to remove Clean Harbors, Inc. as a defendant in this action, 15 but wishes to proceed against both Clean Harbors, Inc. and Clean Harbors 16 Industrial Services, Inc. 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: 18 1. Plaintiff may amend her Complaint to add Clean Harbors Industrial 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Services, Inc. as a Defendant in this action. 2. Plaintiff is directed to file the amended complaint within seven (7) days of the entry of this order. DATED: September 30, 2015 DAVID YEREMIAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. By /s/Michele Jackson David Yeremian Michele L. Jackson Attorneys for Plaintiff LAURA EMERTON 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. AS A DEFENDANT 1 DATED: September 30, 2015 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 2 3 By: 4 5 6 7 /s/Victoria L. Tallman Sarah R. Nichols Victoria L. Tallman Attorneys for Defendant CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. (erroneously sued as Clean Harbors, Inc.) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. AS A DEFENDANT ORDER 1 2 3 The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore: 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff, LAURA EMERTON is granted 5 leave to amend her Complaint to add Defendant Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. 6 as a defendant in this action. Plaintiff is directed to file the amended complaint 7 within seven (7) days of the entry of this order. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 Dated: September 30, 2015 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PERMIT PLAINTIFF TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD CLEAN HARBORS INDUSTRIAL SERVICE, INC. AS A DEFENDANT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?