Dicey v. Cobb et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/10/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for Reconsideration 59 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BERLAN LYNELL DICEY,

12

No. 2:14-cv-2661 TLN CKD P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

T. COBB, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

On December 28, 2016, Plaintiff filed a document the Court construes as a request for

18

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s December 2, 2016 order. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule

19

303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.”

20

Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that any of the Magistrate

21

Judge’s rulings in the December 2, 2016 order are clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22
23

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No.
59) is denied.

24
25

Dated: January 10, 2017

26
27
28

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge