Rivkin v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.

Filing 26

STIPULATION and ORDER 25 for extension of time signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/21/2015. Defendant JPMorgan Chase has to and including 2/19/2015 to respond to plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Amy M. Spicer (SBN 188399) One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 Tel: 415.442.1000 Fax: 415.963.1001 E-mail: aspicer@morganlewis.com MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Joseph Duffy (SBN 241854) 300 South Grand Avenue Twenty-Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132 Tel: 213.612.2500 Fax: 213.612.2501 Email: jduffy@morganlewis.com Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 16 VLADIMIR RIVKIN, Case No. 14-2662-TLN-EFB 17 vs. 19 20 21 22 23 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ORDER Plaintiff, 18 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a New York association; FAY SERVICING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; ALBERTELLI LAW PARTNERS CALIFORNIA, PA, a California corporation,, and DOES 1 through 10, 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1 LOS ANGELES DB2/ 25713314.2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC CASE NO. 14-2662-TLN-EFB 1 Plaintiff Vladimir Rivkin (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, 2 N.A. (“JPMC” and with Plaintiff, the “Parties”), hereby enter into this Stipulation 3 to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint 4 with reference to the following facts: RECITALS 5 6 A. On or about October 16, 2014, Plaintiff commenced an action in the 7 Superior Court for the County of Nevada entitled Rivkin v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, 8 N.A., et al., Case Number TCU14-5931 (the “State Court Action”). 9 10 11 12 13 B. On or around October 23, 2014, Plaintiff served the Summons and First Amended Complaint on JPMC. C. On November 14, 2014, JPMC timely removed the State Court Action to this Court. D. On November 25, 2014, the Parties entered into a stipulation to extend 14 the time for JPMC to respond to the First Amended Complaint to allow the Plaintiff 15 and co-defendant Fay Servicing LLC to engage in discussions regarding the then 16 pending Trustee’s Sale and in view of the possibility of Plaintiff filing a second 17 amended complaint. JPMC’s current deadline to respond to the First Amended 18 Complaint is January 22, 2015. 19 20 21 22 23 E. On January 8, 2015, Plaintiff filed a request for leave to file a second amended complaint. (Docket No. 21.) F. As of January 20, 2015, the Court has not yet ruled on Plaintiff’s request for leave to file the second amended complaint. G. In view of Plaintiff’s pending request for leave to amend the operative 24 complaint, the Parties have agreed to extend the time for JPMC to respond to 25 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint to and including February 19, 2015. 26 27 28 F. to the First Amended Complaint. IT IS THEREFOR STIPULATED that JPMC shall have to and including MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 2 ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES This is the Parties’ second request for an extension of time to respond DB2/ 25713314.2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC CASE NO. 14-2662-TLN-EFB 1 February 19, 2015 to respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. 2 3 Dated: January 21, 2015 4 FRANZ LAW By: 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff VLADIMIR RIVKIN 7 8 /s/ Pamela M. Schuur (as authorized on January 21, 2015) Pamela M. Schuur Dated: January 20, 2015 9 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP By: /s/ Amy M. Spicer Amy M. Spicer 10 Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. 11 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 21, 2015 19 20 21 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 3 ATTORNEYS AT LAW LOS ANGELES DB2/ 25713314.2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC CASE NO. 14-2662-TLN-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?