Woods v. Swift et al
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING 21 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/9/2015. Defendants' 17 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED and they are directed to file a response to Complaint within 20 days of service of this Order. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL WOODS,
12
No. 2:14-cv-2665 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
B. SWIFT, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On May 28, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 28, 2015, are adopted in full;
3
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 17) is denied; and
4
3. Defendants are directed to file a response to the complaint within twenty days of
5
service of this order.
6
DATED: July 9, 2015
7
/s/ John A. Mendez__________________________
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?