J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Thao

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/2/2015 GRANTING 4 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application continuing the Scheduling Conference to 4/27/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. A Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than April 13, 2015. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Thomas P. Riley, SBN 194706 LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. First Library Square 1114 Fremont Avenue South Pasadena, CA 91030-3227 Tel: 626-799-9797 Fax: 626-799-9795 TPRLAW@att.net Attorneys for Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMETNO DIVISION 8 9 10 J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02669-WBS-AC 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 14 MANG PHENG THAO, 15 PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; AND ORDER (Proposed) Defendant. 16 TO THE HONORABLE WILLIAM B. SHUBB, THE DEFENDANT AND HIS 17 18 ATTORNEY/S OF RECORD: Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc., hereby applies ex parte for an order continuing the 19 20 Initial Scheduling Conference presently set for Monday, March 16, 2015 at 2:00 PM. As set forth below Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court continue the Initial Scheduling Conference to a new 21 date approximately Thirty (30) to Forty-Five (45) days forward. 22 23 The request for the brief continuance is necessitated by the fact that Plaintiff has not yet perfected service of the initiating suit papers upon the Defendant Mang Pheng Thao, individually 24 and d/b/a Sunrise 2 Sunset Grill. As a result, Plaintiff’s counsel has not conferred with the defendant 25 concerning the claims, discovery, settlement, ADR or any of the other pertinent issues involving the 26 case itself or the preparation of a Joint Status Report. 27 /// 28 In addition, Thomas P. Riley, Plaintiff’s counsel in this action, has calendaring conflicts on Monday, March 16, 2015 as Mr. Riley is scheduled to appear before the Honorable David R. PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; AND ORDER (Proposed) CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02669-WBS-AC 1 Strawbridge of the U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Division in the 2 matter of J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Baldino, et al.,; Case No. 2:14-cv-02444-AB for a Follow- 3 Up Status Telephone Conference re: Settlement matter and Scheduling a Settlement Conference at 4:30 4 P.M. (EDT) that very same day (ECF# 25); and a Initial Scheduling Conference before Honorable 5 William B. Shubb of the U.S.D.C. for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division in the 6 7 matter of J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Hamad,; Case No. 2:14-cv-02728-WBS-DAD at 2:00 P.M. that very same day (ECF# 3) as well. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Honorable Court continue the Initial 8 Scheduling Conference, presently scheduled for Monday, March 16, 2015 at 2:00 PM. 9 10 11 12 Respectfully submitted, 13 14 15 Dated: March 2, 2015 16 17 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /s/ Thomas P. Riley LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS P. RILEY, P.C. By: Thomas P. Riley Attorneys for Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc. /// 22 23 /// /// /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 ORDER 28 PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; AND ORDER (Proposed) CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02669-WBS-AC It is hereby ordered that the Initial Scheduling Conference in civil action number 2:14-cv-02669- 1 2 WBS-AC styled J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Thao, is hereby continued from 2:00 PM, Monday, 3 March 16, 2015 to April 27, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. A Joint Status Report shall be filed no later than April 4 13, 2015, and shall include a response by the defendant. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on the Defendant and thereafter file a Certification of 5 6 Service of this Order with the Clerk of the Court. 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: March 2, 2015 11 12 /// 13 /// 14 /// 15 /// 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 20 21 /// /// /// /// 22 23 PROOF OF SERVICE (SERVICE BY MAIL) 24 25 I declare that: 26 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, California. I am over the age of eighteen years 27 28 and not a party to the within cause; my business address is 1114 Fremont Avenue, South Pasadena, California. I am readily familiar with this law firm's practice for collection and processing of correspondence/documents for mail in the ordinary course of business. PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; AND ORDER (Proposed) CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02669-WBS-AC 1 2 On March 2, 2015, I caused to serve the following documents entitled: 3 4 PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; AND ORDER (Proposed) 5 6 7 On all parties in said cause by enclosing a true copy thereof in a sealed envelope with postage prepaid and following ordinary business practices, said envelope was addressed to: 8 9 10 Mang Pheng Thao (Defendant) 10113 Folsom Boulevard, Suites C-D Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 11 The fully sealed envelope with pre-paid postage was thereafter placed in our law firm’s 12 outbound mail receptacle in order that this particular piece of mail could be taken to the United States 13 14 15 Post Office in South Pasadena, California later this day by myself (or by another administrative assistant duly employed by our law firm). I declare under the penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the United States that the foregoing 16 is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on March 2, 2015, at South Pasadena, 17 California. 18 19 20 Dated: March 2, 2015 /s/ Vanessa Morales VANESSA MORALES 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; AND ORDER (Proposed) CASE NO. 2:14-cv-02669-WBS-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?