Lynn v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Employees
Filing
25
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/27/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CALVIN S. LYNN,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. 2:14-cv-2690 WBS KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYEES,
et al.
Defendants.
18
19
By order filed September 8, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days
20
leave to file an amended complaint was granted. (See ECF No. 22.) More than forty-five days
21
from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise
22
responded to the court’s order.
23
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
25
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
26
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
27
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
28
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
1
1
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
2
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
3
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
4
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
Dated: October 27, 2015
6
7
8
/lynn2690.fta
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?