Green v. Cox et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/16/2016 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DAMIAN GREEN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:14-cv-2697 AC P v. ORDER B. COX, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 By an order filed June 25, 2015, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the 16 17 court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant B. Cox. 18 That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s 19 order. 20 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the June 25, 2015 order was 21 returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court 22 apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents 23 at the record address of the party is fully effective. 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. 25 Civ. P. 41(b). 26 DATED: December 16, 2016 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?