Villegas v. City of Sacramento
Filing
23
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/4/2017 DISMISSING this matter with prejudice; ORDERING the parties to bear their own respective costs. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Robin K. Perkins, SBN: 131252
Natalia D. Asbill, SBN: 281860
PERKINS & ASSOCIATES
300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
916. 446.2000
Facsimile:
916. 447.6400
rperkins@perkins-lawoffice.com
nasbill@perkins-lawoffice.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DAVID VILLEGAS
James Sanchez, City Attorney, SBN: 116356
Kathleen T. Rogan, Senior Deputy City Attorney, SBN: 186055
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
915 I Street, Room 4010
Sacramento, CA 95814-2608
Telephone: 916.808-5346
Facsimile: 916.808.7455
krogan@cityofsacramento.org
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
DAVID VILLEGAS,
Plaintiff
18
19
20
v.
22
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a public
entity and a political subdivision of the
State of California; and DOES 1 through
20, inclusive.
23
Case No. 2:14-CV-02703-MCE-AC
ORDER ON STIPULATED DISMISSAL
(FRCP, Rule 41(a)(1)
CTRM: 7, 14th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.
Trial Date: January 23, 2017
Defendants.
21
24
25
26
27
28
PERKINS & ASSOCIATES
300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.446.2000
On November 21, 2016, the parties jointly submitted a Stipulation of Dismissal to the Court.
ECF No. 20.
Accordingly, the instant matter is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the parties will bear their
own respective costs, including attorney fees and other litigation expenses.
1
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: January 4, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PERKINS & ASSOCIATES
300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.446.2000
Order on Stipulated Dismissal
2.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?