Villegas v. City of Sacramento

Filing 23

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/4/2017 DISMISSING this matter with prejudice; ORDERING the parties to bear their own respective costs. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Robin K. Perkins, SBN: 131252 Natalia D. Asbill, SBN: 281860 PERKINS & ASSOCIATES 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916. 446.2000 Facsimile: 916. 447.6400 rperkins@perkins-lawoffice.com nasbill@perkins-lawoffice.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs DAVID VILLEGAS James Sanchez, City Attorney, SBN: 116356 Kathleen T. Rogan, Senior Deputy City Attorney, SBN: 186055 CITY OF SACRAMENTO 915 I Street, Room 4010 Sacramento, CA 95814-2608 Telephone: 916.808-5346 Facsimile: 916.808.7455 krogan@cityofsacramento.org Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF SACRAMENTO 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 DAVID VILLEGAS, Plaintiff 18 19 20 v. 22 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a public entity and a political subdivision of the State of California; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive. 23 Case No. 2:14-CV-02703-MCE-AC ORDER ON STIPULATED DISMISSAL (FRCP, Rule 41(a)(1) CTRM: 7, 14th Floor Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. Trial Date: January 23, 2017 Defendants. 21 24 25 26 27 28 PERKINS & ASSOCIATES 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 Sacramento, CA 95814 916.446.2000 On November 21, 2016, the parties jointly submitted a Stipulation of Dismissal to the Court. ECF No. 20. Accordingly, the instant matter is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the parties will bear their own respective costs, including attorney fees and other litigation expenses. 1 The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: January 4, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PERKINS & ASSOCIATES 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 Sacramento, CA 95814 916.446.2000 Order on Stipulated Dismissal 2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?