Muir v. U.C. Davis et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 1/5/15 ORDERING that the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 5 is DENIED as moot and the hearing is VACATED. Plaintiff shall file an amended Complaint substituting the estate or successors in interest of Plaintiff John Muir on or before 1/16/15. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 Charles D. Caraway/SBN: 289360 THE CARAWAY LAW FIRM 2 980 9TH Street, 16th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 3 Tel: (916) 449-9551 4 ccaraway@thecarawaylawfirm.com 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 7 8 9 LEWIS MUIR, Case No.: 2:14-CV-02716-MCE-CKD 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS THE REGENTS OF THE 12 UC DAVIS; ELIZABETH DAVID M.D.; PAUL UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA’S, PAUL 13 PERYY, M.D.; MEGAN DALY, M.D.; and PERVY, M.D.’S AND MEGAN DALY, DOES 1-100. M.D.’S MOTION TO DISMISS 14 PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Defendants. 15   16 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, the parties herein, by and through their respective attorneys, agree 17 and stipulate to immediately dismiss Defendants The Regents of the University of California, Paul Pervy, 18 19 20 21 M.D.’s and Megan Daly, M.D.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. WHEREAS this case involves multiple parties, the death of the original Plaintiff, and the recent discovery that the United States of America is a party; the parties have had difficulty in meeting and 22 conferring with regard to amending the Complaint to include Plaintiff’s estate in place of Plaintiff John 23 Muir subsequent to his death. As such, Defendants original extension on filing a responsive pleading was 24 about to lapse prior to an agreement amongst parties on how they were to proceed in this matter. Thus, 25 Defendants filed the aforementioned dispositive motion as a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s complaint, 26 27 addressing the need for an Amended Complaint. Plaintiff’s counsel is in agreement with Defendants that the original complaint requires an amendment, and thus parties stipulate to the following: 28 1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND AMONG THE PARTIES, THROUGH THEIR 2 COUNSEL, AS FOLLOWS: 3 That Plaintiff file an Amended Complaint substituting Plaintiff John Muir, with his estate or 4 successor in interest. The Amended Complaint is to be filed no later than January 16, 2015. In consideration 5 for the filing of this Amended Complaint, Defendants The Regents of the University of California, Paul 6 7 Pervy, M.D.’s and Megan Daly, M.D.’s will immediately dismiss their pending Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. 8 9 10 It is so stipulated. Dated: 12/18/2014 11 WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP By: /s/ BIANCA S. WATTS BIANCA S. WATTS Attorney for Defendants The Regents of the University of California, Paul Pervy, M.D. and Megan Daly, M.D. 12 13 14 Dated: 12/18/2014 THE CARAWAY LAW FIRM 15 By: /s/ CHARLES D. CARAWAY CHARLES D. CARAWAY 16 Attorney for Plaintiffs 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER 1 2 Having reviewed the stipulation, signed by all parties, IT IS ORDERED THAT the Motion to 3 Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint in this matter (ECF No. 5) previously calendared to be heard by the 4 Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. on January 8, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7, is DENIED as moot 5 6 7 8 and the hearing is VACATED. It is also ordered that Plaintiff file an amended Complaint substituting the estate or successors in in interest of Plaintiff John Muir on or before January 16, 2015. IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: January 5, 2015 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?