Crawford, Sr. v. Moore

Filing 15

AMENDED 14 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/17/15 ORDERING that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 13, 2015 13 , are adopted in full; 2. Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7 ) is granted as follows: a. The claim against Moore under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., is dismissed with prejudice; b. The claim under Section 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, claim is dismissed with prejudice; c. The claim under Secti on 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, is dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days; d. The claim under Section 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, is dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days; e. That the claim under Section 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, is dismissed with prejudice; f. The claim under Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000a, et seq., is dismissed with prejudice; and g. The claim under Section 8(f), 29 U.S.C. § 158(f), is dismissed with prejudice. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

REVEREND WESLEY CRAWFORD SR.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-2725 JAM AC (PS)

v.

AMENDED ORDER

LISA M. MOORE,

15

Defendant.

16
17

This order amends and supersedes the order filed June 15, 2015, ECF No. 14.

18

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a

19

United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On April 13, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20
21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 13) Neither

23

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 13, 2015 (ECF No. 13), are adopted in

27
28

full;
1

1

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7) is granted as follows:

2
3

a. The claim against Moore under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42
U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq., is dismissed with prejudice;

4
5

b. The claim under Section 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, claim is dismissed with
prejudice;

6

c. The claim under Section 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of the Due

7

Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, is dismissed with leave to

8

amend within 30 days;

9

d. The claim under Section 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of the Equal

10

Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, is dismissed with leave

11

to amend within 30 days;

12
13

e. That the claim under Section 1983, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of the Due
Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, is dismissed with prejudice;

14
15

f. The claim under Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000a, et
seq., is dismissed with prejudice; and

16
17

g. The claim under Section 8(f), 29 U.S.C. § 158(f), is dismissed with prejudice.
DATED: June 17, 2015

18

/s/ John A. Mendez_________________________

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

20
21

Craw2725.801

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2