Singh v. Holder et al
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/6/15 ORDERING that this case is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (915) 554-2700
Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Respondents
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
JASPAL SINGH,
12
13
Petitioner,
Case No. 2:14-cv-2727 KJN P
STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL AND
ORDER
v.
14
ERIC H. HOLDER, et al.,
15
Respondents.
16
17
This is an immigration case in which petitioner Jaspal Singh challenges his detention by
18
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The parties now stipulate to dismissal as petitioner has
19
20
been removed pursuant to a warrant of removal. Because petitioner has been removed, and is no
longer in detention, his habeas petition challenging his confinement is moot, and the parties
21
stipulate to dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). Picrin-Peron v. Rison, 930 F.2d 773
22
(9th Cir. 1991) (habeas petition dismissed as moot because INS Director had released (paroled)
23
24
25
alien petitioner). Each side to bear its own cost of litigation.
1
December 31, 2014
2
Respectfully Submitted,
3
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
4
5
By:
/s/ Audrey B. Hemesath
Audrey B. Hemesath
Assistant United States Attorney
By:
/s/ Wahida Noorzad
Wahida Noorzad
Saad Ahmad & Associates
6
7
8
9
10
ORDER
11
12
13
Both parties consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C.
14
ยง 636(c). Pursuant to the joint stipulation, the matter is dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of
15
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
16
Dated: January 6, 2015
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
/sing2727.41a
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?