Sermeno v. Spearman
Filing
116
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/11/2020 115 Findings and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to keep the court apprised of a current address. See FRCP 41(b); see also L.R. 110, 183(b), and The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LARRY ALTAMIRANO SERMENO,
12
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-2729 JAM DB P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
M.E. SPEARMAN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 6, 2019, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 115).
23
Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations issued November 6, 2019 (ECF No. 115) are
ADOPTED in full,
1
1
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to
2
keep the court apprised of a current address. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also L.R. 110, 183(b),
3
and
4
5
3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. §
2253.
6
7
8
9
DATED: May 11, 2020
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?