Hart v. Young, et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/15/16 GRANTING 14 Motion for Extension of time; Clerk to send plaintiff: 1 Summons, 2 USM-285 Forms, and 1 copy of the Complaint filed on 11/20/14; Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the proper documents to the court.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD HART, 12 13 No. 2:14-cv-2732 JAM CKD (TEMP) P Plaintiff, v. ORDER 14 KIMBERLYN YOUNG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has requested a second extension of time to submit the documents required to 18 effect service pursuant to the court’s order of December 18, 2015. Plaintiff has also submitted a 19 request that the Clerk of the Court resend the forms necessary to effectuate service. Good cause 20 appearing, both requests will be granted. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Plaintiff’s March 16, 2016, motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 14) is granted; 23 2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff two USM-285 forms, one summons, an 24 25 26 instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed November 20, 2014. 3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court: 27 a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents; 28 b. One completed summons; 1 2 3 4 c. One completed USM-285 form for Associate Warden Kimberlyn Young and S. Cervantes; and d. Three copies of the endorsed complaint filed November 20, 2014. Dated: April 15, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 /kly;mb;hart2732.36usm.sec 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?