Hart v. Young, et al
Filing
8
ORDER; FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/18/15 DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SERVICE DOCUMENTS and USM-285 Forms within 30 days. Service is appropriate for S. Cervantes, Kimberlyn Young. Clerk to send pl aintiff: 1 Summons, 2 USM-285 Forms, and 1 copy of the Complaint filed on 11/20/14.Plaintiffs request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 4 , 5 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Clerk of the Court shall appoint a district judge in this action. It is RECOMMENDED that Warden Swarthout be dismissed from this action. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD HART,
12
13
No. 2:14-cv-2732 CKD (TEMP) P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER &
14
KIMBERLYN YOUNG, et al,
15
Defendants.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
18
§ 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This
19
proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
20
Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C.
21
22
§ 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted.
Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C.
23
§§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee in
24
accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct
25
the appropriate agency to collect the initial partial filing fee from plaintiff’s trust account and
26
forward it to the Clerk of the Court. Thereafter, plaintiff will be obligated for monthly payments
27
of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to plaintiff’s prison trust account.
28
These payments will be forwarded by the appropriate agency to the Clerk of the Court each time
1
1
the amount in plaintiff’s account exceeds $10.00, until the filing fee is paid in full. 28 U.S.C.
2
§ 1915(b)(2).
3
The complaint states potentially-cognizable claims for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
4
and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) against Associate Warden Kimberlyn Young and S. Cervantes. If the
5
allegations of the complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the
6
merits of this action. However, plaintiff has failed to plead any allegations regarding Warden
7
Swarthout’s involvement in the alleged civil rights violations. Accordingly, the complaint fails to
8
state a claim against Warden G. Swarthout, and he should therefore be dismissed from this action.
9
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
10
1. Plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
11
2. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff
12
is assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
13
§ 1915(b)(1). All fees shall be collected and paid in accordance with this court’s order to the
14
Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently
15
herewith.
16
17
3. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Associate Warden Kimberlyn
Young and S. Cervantes.
18
19
4. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff two USM-285 forms, one summons, an
instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed November 20, 2014.
20
5. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached
21
Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:
22
a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;
23
b. One completed summons;
24
c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 3 above;
25
26
and
d. Three copies of the endorsed complaint filed November 20, 2014.
27
6. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service.
28
Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to
2
1
serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment
2
of costs.
3
7. The Clerk of the Court shall appoint a district judge in this action.
4
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Warden Swarthout be dismissed from this action.
5
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
6
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
7
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
8
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
9
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
10
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
11
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
12
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
13
Dated: December 18, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
15
16
JM /hart2732.1
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD HART,
12
13
No. 2:14-cv-2732 CKD (TEMP) P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
14
KIMBERLYN YOUNG, et al,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed
_____________________:
19
____
completed summons form
20
____
completed USM-285 forms
21
____
copies of the ___________________
Complaint
22
23
DATED:
24
________________________________
Plaintiff
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?