Muhammad-Snell v. Rackley et al

Filing 16

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/28/15 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. F&R referred to Judge Senior Judge William B. Shubb. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EVERETT MUHAMMAD-SNELL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-2733 WBS KJN P

v.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

RONALD RACKLEY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
By order filed March 12, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave

17
18

to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and

19

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

20
21

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

22

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

25

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

26

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

27

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

28

////
1

1

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

2

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: April 28, 2015

4
5
6

/muha2733.fta

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2