Hoffmann v. Corning Police Department

Filing 8

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/14/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBIN HOFFMAN,

12
13
14

No. 2:14-cv-2736 MCE KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CORNING POLICE DEPARTMENT,

15

Defendant.

16
17

By an order filed December 3, 2014, plaintiff was ordered to file a complaint, and an

18

application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days.

19

Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be

20

dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s

21

order and has not filed a complaint or an in forma pauperis application or paid the appropriate

22

filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

23

prejudice.

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

27

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

28

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
1

1

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

2

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

3

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: January 14, 2015

5
6
/hoff2736.fifp

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2