Lacy v. Folk et al

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/4/2017 DENYING 40 Motion for Extension of Time and 41 Motion to Appoint Counsel without prejudice in the instant case, but motions to remain pending in 2:16-cv-1859 CKD P. Any documents filed by plaintiff in the instant closed case will be disregarded and no orders will be issued in response. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RONNIE STERLING LACY, 11 12 13 No. 2:14-cv-2770 JAM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER FRED FOULK, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff has submitted two motions which were filed in both the instant case, which was 17 closed on April 20, 2017, and in Lacy v. Taylor, Case No. 2:16-cv-01859 CKD P, which remains 18 pending. The submitted motions are pertinent only to the latter case. 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 20 1. Plaintiff’s motions filed April 28, 2017 (ECF Nos. 40 & 41) are denied without 21 prejudice in the instant case, but should remain pending in Lacy v. Taylor, Case No. 2:16-cv- 22 01859 CKD P. 23 2. Plaintiff is informed that he should file no further documents in the instant case; any 24 documents filed by plaintiff after the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in 25 response thereto. 26 DATED: May 4, 2017 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?