Maxwell v. Holder, et al
Filing
44
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/20/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 are ADOPTED in FULL; Defendants' 19 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; Plaintiff's 22 motion for summary judgment and request for judicial notice is DENIED as MOOT. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VALENTINA S. MAXWELL,
12
13
No. 2:14-cv-2772 TLN AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
14
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States
Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On May 15, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
21
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 32.) Plaintiff
22
filed objections to the findings and recommendations on May 26, 2015. (ECF No. 36.)
23
Defendants filed a response to the objections to the findings and recommendations on May 28,
24
2015. (ECF No. 37.)
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
26
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
27
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
28
analysis.
1
1
////
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 15, 2015 are adopted in full;
4
2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 19), is granted and Plaintiff’s Complaint is
5
6
7
dismissed without prejudice;
3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and request for judicial notice, (ECF No.
22), is denied as moot.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated: July 20, 2015
11
12
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?