Puckett v. Agboli et al

Filing 58

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/20/2018 DENYING plaintiff's 51 motion to compel. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, 12 No. 2:14-CV-2776-JAM-CMK-P Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 A. AGBOLI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 ORDER Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel (Doc 51). 19 In his one-page motion, plaintiff states: “Plaintiff hereby request the court to 20 enforce Agboli to furnish production of documents. . . .” The majority of plaintiff’s argument 21 concerns discovery responses provided by defendant Agboli. In the last sentence of his motion, 22 plaintiff adds: “I further request this court to enforce the rest of the defendants to answer these 23 interrogatories and production of documents. They objected each one by stating objection fails to 24 comply with Rule 36(a)(, 34(c). . . .” 25 /// 26 /// 1 1 Plaintiff’s motion is procedurally defective because it fails to include a 2 “certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the person 3 or party failing to make disclosure or discovery in an effort to obtain it without court action.” 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a)(1). 5 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel (Doc. 51) is denied. 7 8 9 10 DATED: August 20, 2018 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?