Puckett v. Agboli et al
Filing
62
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/9/2018 ADOPTING 57 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 47 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The matter is REFERRED back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:14-CV-2776-JAM-DMC-P
v.
ORDER
A. AGBOLI, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42
18
19
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern
20
District of California local rules.
On August 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
21
22
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
23
objections within the time specified. No objections to the findings and recommendations have
24
been filed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
26
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed August 20, 2018, are adopted in
4
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 47) is denied; and
5
3.
The matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further
3
6
full;
proceedings.
7
8
9
10
DATED: November 9, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?