Puckett v. Agboli et al

Filing 62

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/9/2018 ADOPTING 57 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 47 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. The matter is REFERRED back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:14-CV-2776-JAM-DMC-P v. ORDER A. AGBOLI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 19 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 20 District of California local rules. On August 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 22 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 23 objections within the time specified. No objections to the findings and recommendations have 24 been filed. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 20, 2018, are adopted in 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 47) is denied; and 5 3. The matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further 3 6 full; proceedings. 7 8 9 10 DATED: November 9, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?