Puckett v. Agboli et al
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/30/16 ORDERING that the court will disregard plaintiff's prematurely filed 4 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff may re-file his motion for summary judgment at the appropriate time. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT,
12
No. 2:14-cv-2776-CMK-P
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
A. AGBOLI, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
18
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 4).
20
Plaintiff’s motion is premature. Defendants have not filed an answer, and therefore have not
21
made a general appearance. As the case is not at issue, no discovery has been completed and
22
there currently is no opposing party. As such, the motion for summary judgment is premature
23
and will be disregarded. Plaintiff may re-file his motion once the case is at issue and discovery
24
has been conducted.
25
Accordingly, the court will disregard plaintiff’s prematurely filed motion for
26
summary judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the summary judgment
1
1
motion as a pending motion on the docket. Plaintiff may re-file his motion for summary
2
judgment at the appropriate time.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
7
DATED: September 30, 2016
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?