Johnson v. Cannon Northgate Warehouse, et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/4/2015 ORDERING that the time for Defendant Cannon Northgate Properties to respond to Plaintiff's complaint is EXTENDED to 3/19/2015. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 DAVID A. RIEGELS - 043857 1228 46th Street Post Office Box 19579 Sacramento, CA 95819-0579 Telephone: (916) 739-0988 4 5 6 Attorney for Defendants CIRCUIT SOLUTIONS, INC., and CANNON NORTHGATE PROPERTIES 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT JOHNSON No. 2:14-CV-02778-TLN-DAD 11 13 14 v. CANNON NORTHGATE WAREHOUSE, and CIRCUIT SOLUTIONS, INC. Complaint Filed: November 26, 2014 15 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [FRPC 6 and Local Rules 143 and 144] Plaintiff 12 Defendants 17 It is hereby stipulated by Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON and by Defendant CANNON 18 NORTHGATE PROPERTIES, a California General Partnership, sued herein as CANNON 19 NORTHGATE WAREHOUSE, by and through their respective attorneys, that the time for 20 21 Defendant CANNON NORTHGATE PROPERTIES to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint shall be extended to March 19, 2015 in order to facilitate the parties’ ongoing settlement negotiations. 22 Dated: February 27, 2015 23 24 PHYL GRACE - 171771 CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS 25 /S/ Phyl Grace (as authorized on February 27, 2015) 26 27 DAVI D A. RIEGEL S SACRAMENTO 28 Attorney for Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON -1- STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 1 Dated: February 27, 2015 2 DAVID A. RIEGELS - 043857 3 4 /S/ David A. Riegels Attorney for Defendant CANNON NORTHGATE PROPERTIES. 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 4, 2015 11 12 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVI D A. RIEGEL S SACRAMENTO -2STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?