Johnson v. Cannon Northgate Warehouse, et al
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/4/2015 ORDERING that the time for Defendant Cannon Northgate Properties to respond to Plaintiff's complaint is EXTENDED to 3/19/2015. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
DAVID A. RIEGELS - 043857
1228 46th Street
Post Office Box 19579
Sacramento, CA 95819-0579
Telephone: (916) 739-0988
4
5
6
Attorney for Defendants
CIRCUIT SOLUTIONS, INC., and
CANNON NORTHGATE PROPERTIES
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SCOTT JOHNSON
No. 2:14-CV-02778-TLN-DAD
11
13
14
v.
CANNON NORTHGATE WAREHOUSE,
and CIRCUIT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Complaint Filed: November 26, 2014
15
16
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
DEFENDANT’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
[FRPC 6 and Local Rules 143 and 144]
Plaintiff
12
Defendants
17
It is hereby stipulated by Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON and by Defendant CANNON
18
NORTHGATE PROPERTIES, a California General Partnership, sued herein as CANNON
19
NORTHGATE WAREHOUSE, by and through their respective attorneys, that the time for
20
21
Defendant CANNON NORTHGATE PROPERTIES to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint shall be
extended to March 19, 2015 in order to facilitate the parties’ ongoing settlement negotiations.
22
Dated: February 27, 2015
23
24
PHYL GRACE - 171771
CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS
25
/S/ Phyl Grace (as authorized on February 27, 2015)
26
27
DAVI D A.
RIEGEL S
SACRAMENTO
28
Attorney for Plaintiff
SCOTT JOHNSON
-1-
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
1
Dated: February 27, 2015
2
DAVID A. RIEGELS - 043857
3
4
/S/ David A. Riegels
Attorney for Defendant
CANNON NORTHGATE PROPERTIES.
5
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 4, 2015
11
12
13
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DAVI D A.
RIEGEL S
SACRAMENTO
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?