Kastiro et al v. Serra Medical Transportation Inc et al
Filing
11
ORDER granting 5 Motion to Change Venue signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/8/15. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
ASHOUR KASTIRO, ODAY
ALSOLTANI, SAID NATSHEH,
ALHARETH ALI ALOUDI, and
REYADH ALMEHAMEDAWY,
v.
11
13
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA*
Plaintiffs,
10
12
No. 2:14-cv-02784-GEB-EFB
SERRA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION,
INC.; SERRA YELLOW CAB; TALIB
SALAMIN; and DOES 1-20,
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiffs
16
to
the
move
an
District of California[,]” asserting the Complaint was improperly
19
filed in the Eastern District “due to an administrative error.”
20
(Mot. 2:2-12, ECF No. 5.) Plaintiffs allege in the Complaint:
21
“[v]enue
22
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331(b). Most, if not all Members of
23
Plaintiffs’ putative class and proposed collective action reside
24
in California and this District.” (Compl., ¶ 7.) Plaintiffs argue
25
transfer
26
additional
is
in
filing
the
the
Northern
interest
fees
and
of
Court
District
justice
potential
for
the
th[is]
18
in
District
“transfer[ring]
action
proper
States
order
17
is
United
for
of
because
statute
of
Northern
California
it
avoids
limitations
27
*
28
The hearing on January 20, 2015 is vacated pursuant to E.D. Cal. R.
230(g) since this matter is suitable for decision without oral argument.
1
1
issues, and would not prejudice Defendants since they have not
2
yet been served. (Mot. 2:5-9; 2:26-27; 3:1-2; Sutton Decl. ISO
3
Transfer of Venue, ¶¶ 2-3, ECF No. 5-2.)
4
“The district court of a district in which is filed a
5
case
laying
6
dismiss, or if it be in the interests of justice, transfer such
7
case to any district or division in which it could have been
8
brought.”
9
justice requires transferring the case to the proper venue rather
10
than dismissing the case.” Leroy-Garcia v. Brave Arts Licensing,
11
No. C-13-01181 LB, 2013 WL 4013869, *4 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2014).
12
A court may consider the “age of [an] action,” and “delay and
13
expense involved in re-filing” in a new district when considering
14
transfer of venue. Johnson v. Law, 19 F. Supp. 3d 1004, 1010
15
(S.D. Cal. 2014.)
28
venue
U.S.C.
in
§
the
wrong
1406(a).
division
or
“Ordinarily,
district
the
shall
interest
of
16
The interests of justice favor transferring this case
17
to the Northern District of California. Therefore, the Clerk of
18
Court shall transfer this case and the action shall be closed.
19
Dated:
January 8, 2015
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?