Kastiro et al v. Serra Medical Transportation Inc et al

Filing 11

ORDER granting 5 Motion to Change Venue signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/8/15. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 ASHOUR KASTIRO, ODAY ALSOLTANI, SAID NATSHEH, ALHARETH ALI ALOUDI, and REYADH ALMEHAMEDAWY, v. 11 13 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA* Plaintiffs, 10 12 No. 2:14-cv-02784-GEB-EFB SERRA MEDICAL TRANSPORTATION, INC.; SERRA YELLOW CAB; TALIB SALAMIN; and DOES 1-20, Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiffs 16 to the move an District of California[,]” asserting the Complaint was improperly 19 filed in the Eastern District “due to an administrative error.” 20 (Mot. 2:2-12, ECF No. 5.) Plaintiffs allege in the Complaint: 21 “[v]enue 22 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331(b). Most, if not all Members of 23 Plaintiffs’ putative class and proposed collective action reside 24 in California and this District.” (Compl., ¶ 7.) Plaintiffs argue 25 transfer 26 additional is in filing the the Northern interest fees and of Court District justice potential for the th[is] 18 in District “transfer[ring] action proper States order 17 is United for of because statute of Northern California it avoids limitations 27 * 28 The hearing on January 20, 2015 is vacated pursuant to E.D. Cal. R. 230(g) since this matter is suitable for decision without oral argument. 1 1 issues, and would not prejudice Defendants since they have not 2 yet been served. (Mot. 2:5-9; 2:26-27; 3:1-2; Sutton Decl. ISO 3 Transfer of Venue, ¶¶ 2-3, ECF No. 5-2.) 4 “The district court of a district in which is filed a 5 case laying 6 dismiss, or if it be in the interests of justice, transfer such 7 case to any district or division in which it could have been 8 brought.” 9 justice requires transferring the case to the proper venue rather 10 than dismissing the case.” Leroy-Garcia v. Brave Arts Licensing, 11 No. C-13-01181 LB, 2013 WL 4013869, *4 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2014). 12 A court may consider the “age of [an] action,” and “delay and 13 expense involved in re-filing” in a new district when considering 14 transfer of venue. Johnson v. Law, 19 F. Supp. 3d 1004, 1010 15 (S.D. Cal. 2014.) 28 venue U.S.C. in § the wrong 1406(a). division or “Ordinarily, district the shall interest of 16 The interests of justice favor transferring this case 17 to the Northern District of California. Therefore, the Clerk of 18 Court shall transfer this case and the action shall be closed. 19 Dated: January 8, 2015 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?