Johnson v. Vu et al

Filing 24

CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/16/26. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
6 Center for Disability Access Mark Potter, Esq., SBN 166317 Phyl Grace, Esq., SBN 171771 Ray Ballister Jr., Esq., SBN 111282 Dennis Price, SBN 279082 Mail: PO Box 262490 San Diego, CA 92196-2490 Delivery: 9845 Erma Road, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92131 (858) 375-7385; (888) 422-5191 Fax: (888) 422-5191 phylg@potterhandy.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 Michael Welch + Associates Michael D. Welch (SBN: 111022) 770 L Street, Suite 950 Sacramento, CA. 95814 Telephone: (916) 449-3930 Facsimile: (916) 449-3930 Attorney for Defendant 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 Case No. 2:14-CV-02786-JAM-EFB 16 SCOTT JOHNSON Plaintiff, 17 vs. CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER 18 KIMBERLY T. LE; and Does 1-10, Judge: Honorable Edmund F. Brennan 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 TO THE COURT, ALL INTERESTED PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 28 CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 1 of 5 1 1. Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON filed this action (known as Case No. 2:14-CV-02786- 2 JAM-EFB) against Defendant seeking money damages and injunctive relief for, inter alia, violations 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the "ADA") and corresponding state law claims, as 4 well as common law claims, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 5 on November 27, 2014. Defendant KIMBERLY T. LE ("Defendants") filed his Answer to the 6 Complaint on January 7, 2015. 7 2. Defendant and Plaintiff (collectively sometimes referred to herein as the “Parties” or 8 separately as a “Party”) wish to settle the portion of the cases relating to issues of injunctive relief 9 and hereby desire to enter into this Consent Decree. The Parties hereby enter into this Consent 10 Decree and Order for the purpose of resolving certain specified aspects of the lawsuit without the 11 need for protracted litigation, and without the admission of any liability as to: (a) the amount of 12 damages to which Plaintiff may be entitled or (b) the amount of attorneys’ fees to which Plaintiff 13 may be entitled. 14 15 JURISDICTION: 16 3. The Parties agree that the Court has jurisdiction of this matter for alleged violations of 17 the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq. and pursuant to supplemental 18 jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1367(a) for alleged violations of California Civil Code §§51 and 54 et. 19 seq. 20 4. In order to avoid the costs, expense, and uncertainty of protracted litigation, the 21 Parties agree to entry of this Order to resolve all claims regarding injunctive relief raised in the 22 above-entitled Actions. Accordingly, the Parties agree to the entry of the proposed Order related to 23 this Consent Decree without trial or further adjudication of the issues addressed herein. 24 25 26 NO DISMISSAL OF ACTION REQUESTED: 27 5. 28 As noted herein, monetary issues are still at issue and accordingly the Parties do not request that the Honorable Court dismiss the action as these issues may still proceed to trial. CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 WHEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree and stipulate to the Court’s entry of this Consent Decree and Order, which provides as follows: 4 5 SETTLEMENT OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: 6 6. This Order shall be a full, complete, and final disposition and settlement of Plaintiff’s 7 claims against Defendant and any other parties for injunctive relief that have arisen out of the acts 8 and/or omissions alleged, or which could have been alleged, in the subject Complaint. 9 7. The Parties agree and stipulate that the corrective work will be performed in 10 compliance with the standards and specifications for disabled access as set forth in the California 11 Code of Regulations, Title 24-2 and the 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act Standards, unless 12 other standards are specifically agreed to in this Consent Decree and Order. 13 14 15 8. Remedial Measures: The corrective work agreed upon by the Parties is attached here to as Exhibit “A”. Defendant agree to undertake all of the remedial work set forth therein. 9. Timing of Injunctive Relief: Exhibit “A” also includes the estimated timeframe for 16 completing the work described therein. In the event that unforeseen difficulties prevent Defendant 17 from completing any of the agreed-upon injunctive relief within the timeframes specified, Defendant 18 or his counsel will notify Plaintiff’s counsel, in writing, within fifteen (15) days after discovering any 19 such difficulties. Defendant, or his counsel, will promptly notify Plaintiff’s counsel when the 20 corrective work is complete, and in any case, will provide a status report on or before June 1, 2016. 21 22 23 24 ISSUES RELATED TO DAMAGES, ATTORNEYS FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES, AND COSTS REMAIN UNRESOLVED: 10. The Parties have not reached an agreement regarding Plaintiff’s claims for damages, 25 attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses and costs in this Action (collectively, the “Unresolved Issues”). 26 These Unresolved Issues shall be the subject of further negotiation, settlement, litigation, and/or 27 motions to the Court. Should the Parties later reach an agreement regarding the Unresolved Issues, 28 the terms of that agreement will be set forth in a separate settlement agreement. Nothing set forth CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 3 of 5 1 herein shall be deemed to in any way limit or effect a waiver of either of Plaintiff’s past, present, or 2 future rights and/or remedies to recover damages, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, or costs in 3 connection with each of his alleged losses, costs, damages, claims, and causes of action as set forth 4 in each of the operative Complaints or otherwise. 5 6 ENTIRE CONSENT ORDER: 7 11. This Consent Decree and Order and Exhibit “A” to the Consent Decree, which is 8 incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth in this document, constitute the entire agreement 9 between the signing Parties on all matters of injunctive relief, and no other statement, promise, or 10 agreement, either written or oral, made by any of the Parties or agents of any of the Parties, that is 11 not contained in this written Consent Decree and Order, shall be enforceable regarding the matters of 12 injunctive relief specifically described herein. 13 14 TERM OF THE CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER: 15 12. This Consent Decree and Order shall be in full force and effect for a period of twenty 16 four (24) months after the date of entry of this Consent Decree and Order, or until the injunctive 17 relief contemplated by this Order is completed, whichever occurs later. The Court shall retain 18 jurisdiction of this action to enforce provisions of this Order for twenty four (24) months after the 19 date of this Consent Decree, or until the relief contemplated by this Order is completed, whichever 20 occurs later. 21 SEVERABILITY: 22 13. If any term of this Consent Decree and Order is determined by any court to be 23 unenforceable, all other terms of this Consent Decree and Order shall nonetheless remain in full 24 force and effect. 25 26 SIGNATORIES BIND PARTIES: 27 14. 28 Signatories on the behalf of the Parties represent that they are authorized to bind the Parties to this Consent Decree and Order. This Consent Decree and Order may be signed in CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 4 of 5 1 counterparts and a facsimile or e-mail signature shall have the same force and effect as an original 2 signature. 3 4 Respectfully Submitted, 5 6 Dated: February 8, 2016 CENTER FOR DISABILITY ACCESS 7 By: /s/ Sara Gunderson SARA GUNDERSON Counsel for Plaintiff SCOTT JOHNSON 8 9 10 Dated: February 11, 2016 MICHAEL WELCH + ASSOCIATES 11 12 By: /s/ Michael Welch MICHAEL D. WELCH Counsel for Defendant KIMBERLY T. LE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: February 16, 2016 22 /s/ John A. Mendez__________ HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?