Halcomb v. City of Sacramento et al

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/17/2016. Plaintiff's 42 Motion to Compel is GRANTED in part, pursuant to parties' agreement. In light of agreement, defendants shall produce to plaintiff responsive documents from ti me period September 2012 - August 8, 2014. Pursuant to parties' agreement, defendants shall produce documents to plaintiff promptly, but no more than three weeks from date of this order, and shall communicate with plaintiff's counsel regarding anticipated document production date. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ARLIE HALCOMB,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-2796 MCE KJN (TEMP)

v.

ORDER

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
On March 17, 2016, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of plaintiff’s

17
18

motion to compel. Attorneys Mark Merin and Paul Masuhara appeared on behalf of the plaintiff

19

and attorney Andrea Velasquez appeared on behalf of the defendants.
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set

20
21

forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s motion to compel (Dkt. No. 42) is granted in part, pursuant to the parties’

22
23

agreement;
2. In light of the parties’ agreement, defendants shall produce to plaintiff responsive

24
25

documents from the time period September 2012 to August 8, 2014; and

26

/////

27

////

28

/////
1

1

3. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, defendants shall produce the documents to plaintiff

2

promptly, but no more than three weeks from the date of this order, and shall communicate with

3

plaintiff’s counsel regarding the anticipated document production date.

4

Dated: March 17, 2016

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

halcomb2796.oah.031716

2