Halcomb v. City of Sacramento et al

Filing 58

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/14/16 ORDERING Exhibit C attached to Defendants' Notice of Lodgment of Exhibits in Support of their Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 50-4), and attached to Defendants' Notice of Lodgment of Exhibits in Support of their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Adjudication (Doc. No. 49-4) is hereby substituted with a partially redacted version of the same exhibit. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JAMES SANCHEZ, City Attorney (SBN 116356) ANDREA M. VELASQUEZ, Senior Deputy City Attorney (SBN 249210) AVelasquez@cityofsacramento.org CITY OF SACRAMENTO 915 I Street, Room 4010 Sacramento, CA 95814-2608 Telephone: (916) 808-5346 Telecopier: (916) 808-7455 Attorneys for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Case No.: 2:14-cv-02796-MCE-KJN (TEMP) ARLIE HALCOMB, Plaintiff, ORDER RE SUBSTITUTION OF EXHIBITS vs. CITY OF SACRAMENTO; JUSTIN BROWN, PAUL FONG, ANDREW LEAL, and, Does 1 to 50, inclusive Defendants. 17 18 Based on the Stipulation of the parties to this action, and good cause appearing 19 20 therefore, 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 Exhibit C attached to Defendants’ Notice of Lodgment of Exhibits in Support of their 23 Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 50-4), and attached to Defendants’ 24 Notice of Lodgment of Exhibits in Support of their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for 25 Summary Adjudication (Doc. No. 49-4) is hereby substituted with a partially redacted 26 version of the same exhibit. 27 /// 28 /// 1 544918 ORDER RE SUBSTITUTION OF EXHIBIT 1 2 3 4 The original versions of Exhibit C shall be returned to Defendants’ through their counsel of record. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 14, 2016 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 544918 ORDER RE SUBSTITUTION OF EXHIBIT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?