Halcomb v. City of Sacramento et al
Filing
58
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/14/16 ORDERING Exhibit C attached to Defendants' Notice of Lodgment of Exhibits in Support of their Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 50-4), and attached to Defendants' Notice of Lodgment of Exhibits in Support of their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Adjudication (Doc. No. 49-4) is hereby substituted with a partially redacted version of the same exhibit. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JAMES SANCHEZ, City Attorney (SBN 116356)
ANDREA M. VELASQUEZ, Senior Deputy City Attorney (SBN 249210)
AVelasquez@cityofsacramento.org
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
915 I Street, Room 4010
Sacramento, CA 95814-2608
Telephone: (916) 808-5346
Telecopier: (916) 808-7455
Attorneys for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Case No.: 2:14-cv-02796-MCE-KJN
(TEMP)
ARLIE HALCOMB,
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE SUBSTITUTION OF
EXHIBITS
vs.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO; JUSTIN
BROWN, PAUL FONG, ANDREW LEAL,
and, Does 1 to 50, inclusive
Defendants.
17
18
Based on the Stipulation of the parties to this action, and good cause appearing
19
20
therefore,
21
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
Exhibit C attached to Defendants’ Notice of Lodgment of Exhibits in Support of their
23
Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 50-4), and attached to Defendants’
24
Notice of Lodgment of Exhibits in Support of their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for
25
Summary Adjudication (Doc. No. 49-4) is hereby substituted with a partially redacted
26
version of the same exhibit.
27
///
28
///
1
544918
ORDER RE SUBSTITUTION OF EXHIBIT
1
2
3
4
The original versions of Exhibit C shall be returned to Defendants’ through their counsel
of record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 14, 2016
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
544918
ORDER RE SUBSTITUTION OF EXHIBIT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?