Lucas v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
15
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/13/15. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing no later than 6/19/15 at 4:30 p.m. as to why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. If Plaintiff fails to timely respond to this order, the Clerk is directed to dismiss this case without prejudice without the need for further action from the court or any party. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEFFREY KENT LUCAS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
No. 2:14-cv-2804 AC
ORDER
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
17
18
Plaintiff, proceeding in forma pauperis, seeks judicial review of a final decision of the
19
Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying his application for a period of
20
disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. ECF
21
No. 1. Defendant Commissioner filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that plaintiff’s complaint is
22
barred by the applicable statute of limitations. ECF No. 13. The court ordered plaintiff to file an
23
opposition, or a statement of non-opposition, no later than May 7, 2015. ECF No. 14. The time
24
for plaintiff’s response has expired, but he has not opposed the motion to dismiss, nor otherwise
25
responded to the court’s order.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing no later than June 19, 2015 at
28
4:30 p.m., why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution; and
1
1
2. If plaintiff fails to timely respond to this order, the Clerk of the Court is directed to
2
dismiss this case, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution, without the need for further action
3
from the court or any party.
4
DATED: May 13, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
AC:luca2804.OSC.njc
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?