Lucas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 15

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/13/15. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing no later than 6/19/15 at 4:30 p.m. as to why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. If Plaintiff fails to timely respond to this order, the Clerk is directed to dismiss this case without prejudice without the need for further action from the court or any party. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY KENT LUCAS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. No. 2:14-cv-2804 AC ORDER CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff, proceeding in forma pauperis, seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 19 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying his application for a period of 20 disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. ECF 21 No. 1. Defendant Commissioner filed a motion to dismiss, asserting that plaintiff’s complaint is 22 barred by the applicable statute of limitations. ECF No. 13. The court ordered plaintiff to file an 23 opposition, or a statement of non-opposition, no later than May 7, 2015. ECF No. 14. The time 24 for plaintiff’s response has expired, but he has not opposed the motion to dismiss, nor otherwise 25 responded to the court’s order. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing no later than June 19, 2015 at 28 4:30 p.m., why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution; and 1 1 2. If plaintiff fails to timely respond to this order, the Clerk of the Court is directed to 2 dismiss this case, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution, without the need for further action 3 from the court or any party. 4 DATED: May 13, 2015 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 AC:luca2804.OSC.njc 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?