Garnett v. ADT LLC

Filing 15

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/18/15: This case is related to member case 2:15-0383 JAM DAD. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
----oo0oo----

11
12
13

SHIRLEY GARNETT, on behalf of
herself and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17

CIV. NO. 2:14-2851 WBS DAD

v.
ADT LLC, and Does 1 through
50, inclusive,
Defendants.

18
19
20
21

CIV. NO. 2:15-0383 JAM DAD
RICARDO CASTILLO,
individually and on behalf of
all others similarly
situated,

22
23
24
25
26
27

RELATED CASE ORDER

Plaintiff,
v.
ADT LLC, and Does 1-100,
inclusive,
Defendants.
----oo0oo----

28
1

1

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that

2

these actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule

3

123(a) because they involve the same defendant and similar

4

claims.

5

judge is likely to effect a substantial saving of judicial effort

6

and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.

Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same

7

The parties should be aware that relating the cases

8

under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that both actions are

9

assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the actions is

10

effected.

11

cases are generally assigned to the judge to whom the first filed

12

action was assigned.

13

Under the regular practice of this court, related

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated

14

Shirley Garnett v. ADT LLC, Civ. No. 2:14-2851 WBS DAD, and

15

Richard Castillo v. ADT LLC, Civ. No. 15-383 JAM DAD, be, and the

16

same hereby are, deemed related and the case denominated Richard

17

Castillo v. ADT LLC, Civ. No. 15-383 JAM DAD, shall be assigned

18

to Senior District Judge William B. Shubb and Chief Magistrate

19

Judge Dale A. Drozd.

20

in that case shall be shown as Richard Castillo v. ADT LLC, Civ.

21

No. 15-383 WBS DAD.

22

Henceforth, the caption on documents filed

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make

23

appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to

24

compensate for this assignment.

25

Dated:

February 18, 2015

26
27
28
2