Zamora v. Jones

Filing 8

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/1/15 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY ZAMORA, JR.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:14-cv-2871 KJN P

v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

SCOTT JONES, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

By order filed April 30, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to

18

file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has

19

not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff

20
21

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current

22

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of

23

the party is fully effective.
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is

24
25

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See

26
27

Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

28

////
1

1

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

2

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after

3

being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with

4

the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

5

Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time

6

waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.

7

1991).

8

Dated: July 1, 2015

9
10
/zamo2871.fta

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2