Jones v. Swartz et al

Filing 20

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/22/15 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RAVON JONES,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:14-cv-2877 WBS KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

E. SWARTZ, et al,
Defendants.

16
17

By order filed March 10, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave

18

to file an amended complaint was granted. By order filed April 21, 2015, plaintiff was granted an

19

additional thirty days leave to file an amended complaint, and also cautioned that no further

20

extensions of time would be granted absent a showing of good cause. More than thirty days from

21

that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise

22

responded to the court’s order.

23
24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

28

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
1

1

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

2

objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

3

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

4

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

5

Dated: June 22, 2015

6
7
8

/ jone2877.fta

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2