Rice Aircraft Services, Inc. v. Soars et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/9/15. Plaintiff and Defendants shall conduct their Rule 26(f) conference seven (7) days after the issuance of the Court'S written order on Defendant' Rule 12(b) mo tion; Plaintiff and Defendants shall file their Joint Status Report with this Court, as required by this Court's Order 5 , seven (7) days after the issuance of the Court's written order on Defendants' Rule 12(b) motion; Plaintiff and Defendants shall serve their Rule 26(a) initial disclosures within fourteen (14) days after they conduct their Rule 26(f) conference; Defendants shall be relieved from their obligations under paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 if their motion to dismiss is granted and they are dismissed from the action; and This agreement is not binding on Defendants Peter Wieland and Wieland Aviation Group.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

DOWNEY BRAND LLP
MATTHEW J. WEBER (Bar No. 227314)
AVALON C. JOHNSON (Bar No. 288167)
3425 Brookside Road, Suite A
Stockton, CA 95219-1757
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RICE AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

10
11

RICE AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC.,

DOWNEY BRAND LLP

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
PATRICK SOARS, et al.,

15

Defendant.

Case No. 2:14-cv-02878-MCE-EFB
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR
RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE, JOINT
STATUS REPORT, and RULE 26(a)
DISCLOSURES; ORDER THEREON
Judge:

Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

16
17

WHEREAS Defendants Patrick Soars and Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd.

18

(“Defendants”) intend to file a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) to

19

dismiss the complaint filed in this action by Plaintiff Rice Aircraft Services Inc. (“Plaintiff”); and

20

WHEREAS the parties agree that it is in their interests to conserve their resources and the

21

Court’s by waiting to file a joint status report and exchange initial disclosures pursuant to Rule

22

26(a) until this Court decides Defendants’ Rule 12(b) motion;

23

Plaintiff and Defendants HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

24

1.

25

after the issuance of the Court’s written order on Defendants’ Rule 12(b) motion;

26
27

Plaintiff and Defendants shall conduct their Rule 26(f) conference seven (7) days

2.

Plaintiff and Defendants shall file their Joint Status Report with this Court, as

required by this Court’s Order (ECF No. 5), seven (7) days after the issuance of the Court’s

28
1404366.1

1
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME

1

written order on Defendants’ Rule 12(b) motion;

2
3

3.

fourteen (14) days after they conduct their Rule 26(f) conference;

4
5

4.

Defendants shall be relieved from their obligations under paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 if

their motion to dismiss is granted and they are dismissed from the action; and

6
7

Plaintiff and Defendants shall serve their Rule 26(a) initial disclosures within

5.

This agreement is not binding on Defendants Peter Wieland and Wieland Aviation

Group.

8

SO STIPULATED.

9
10

DATED: April 7, 2015

11
DOWNEY BRAND LLP

12

/s/ Avalon Johnson
MATTHEW J. WEBER
AVALON C. JOHNSON
Attorneys for Plaintiff Rice Aircraft Services, Inc.

13
14
15

DATED: April 7, 2015

16
17

/s/ George B. Piggott_(as auth’d on 4/6/15)
GEORGE B. PIGGOTT, a member of George B.
Piggott, A Professional Corporation
Attorney for Defendants
Patrick Soars and
Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1404366.1

2
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME

1

ORDER

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

3

1.

4

Plaintiff and Defendants shall conduct their Rule 26(f) conference seven (7) days

after the issuance of the Court’s written order on Defendants’ Rule 12(b) motion;
2.

5

Plaintiff and Defendants shall file their Joint Status Report with this Court, as

6

required by this Court’s Order (ECF No. 5), seven (7) days after the issuance of the Court’s

7

written order on Defendants’ Rule 12(b) motion;
3.

8
9

fourteen (14) days after they conduct their Rule 26(f) conference;
4.

10
11

5.

DOWNEY BRAND LLP

This agreement is not binding on Defendants Peter Wieland and Wieland Aviation

Group.

14
15

Defendants shall be relieved from their obligations under paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 if

their motion to dismiss is granted and they are dismissed from the action; and

12
13

Plaintiff and Defendants shall serve their Rule 26(a) initial disclosures within

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 9, 2015

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1404366.1

3
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME