Coze et al v. TBC Corporation et al
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/7/15: HEARING as to 9 MOTION to REMAND reset for 7/27/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
PAMELA E. COGAN (SBN 105089)
STACY M. TUCKER. (SBN 218942)
ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY
1001 Marshall Street, Suite 500
Redwood City, CA 94063-2052
Telephone:
(650) 364-8200
Facsimile:
(650) 780-1701
Email: pcogan@rmkb.com, stucker@rmkb.com
Attorneys for Defendant,
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
6
A Professional Corporation
Redwood City
Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
JOHN COZE and SUSANNA COZE,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No: 2:14-cv-02880-WBS-DAD
Plaintiffs,
v.
TBC CORPORATION, MIDAS REALTY
CORPORATION, MIDAS
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY, MARSH USA INC; and
DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
CONTINUING HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
FROM JUNE 29, 2015 TO JULY 27, 2015
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Good cause having been shown, the stipulation by and between plaintiffs John and
Susanna Coze, and defendants Liberty and Marsh USA Inc., through the parties’ attorneys of
record, seeking to move the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion to remand be moved to July 27, 2015 or
the next date available to the Court, is GRANTED. The hearing of the motion to remand shall be
rescheduled to July 27, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.
///
///
///
28
4842-4535-8371.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER, CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02880-
WBS-DAD
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: May 7, 2015
4
5
6
A Professional Corporation
Redwood City
Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4842-4535-8371.1
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER, CASE NO 2:14-CV-02880-
WBS-DAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?