Coze et al v. TBC Corporation et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/7/15: HEARING as to 9 MOTION to REMAND reset for 7/27/2015 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 PAMELA E. COGAN (SBN 105089) STACY M. TUCKER. (SBN 218942) ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 1001 Marshall Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA 94063-2052 Telephone: (650) 364-8200 Facsimile: (650) 780-1701 Email: pcogan@rmkb.com, stucker@rmkb.com Attorneys for Defendant, LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 6 A Professional Corporation Redwood City Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 JOHN COZE and SUSANNA COZE, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No: 2:14-cv-02880-WBS-DAD Plaintiffs, v. TBC CORPORATION, MIDAS REALTY CORPORATION, MIDAS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, MARSH USA INC; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND FROM JUNE 29, 2015 TO JULY 27, 2015 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Good cause having been shown, the stipulation by and between plaintiffs John and Susanna Coze, and defendants Liberty and Marsh USA Inc., through the parties’ attorneys of record, seeking to move the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion to remand be moved to July 27, 2015 or the next date available to the Court, is GRANTED. The hearing of the motion to remand shall be rescheduled to July 27, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. /// /// /// 28 4842-4535-8371.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER, CASE NO. 2:14-CV-02880- WBS-DAD 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 Dated: May 7, 2015 4 5 6 A Professional Corporation Redwood City Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4842-4535-8371.1 -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER, CASE NO 2:14-CV-02880- WBS-DAD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?