Brandon v. Williams, et al.

Filing 116

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/17/2021 DENYING 91 Motion in Limine without prejudice to renewal following issuance of a final pre-trial order. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KAIAN BRANDON,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:14-CV-2883-TLN-DMC-P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

L. WILLIAMS, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions in limine, ECF No. 91.
Plaintiff seeks pre-trial orders for the following relief: (1) to admonish witnesses

20

not to discuss testimony and to exclude witnesses; (2) to view the Building 9 housing unit

21

observation tower and officers’ station; (3) to exclude evidence of bad act by Plaintiff; and (4) to

22

authenticate documents. Because the Court has not yet issued a final pre-trial order setting the

23

time and manner for consideration of in limine motions, Plaintiff’s motions will be denied

24

without prejudice to renewal following issuance of a final pre-trial order.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 17, 2021
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1