Brandon v. Williams, et al.

Filing 63

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 11/29/2018 GRANTING 61 Motion for Extension of Time, 62 Reply Brief is deemed timely, and 39 , 45 , and 49 Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, which are now fully briefed, will be addressed separately. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

KAIAN BRANDON,

10
11
12

No. 2:14-CV-2883-TLN-DMC-P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

L. WILLIAMS, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to

16

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Doc.

17

61) to file a reply brief in support of his motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing

18

therefor, plaintiff’s motion is granted. Plaintiff’s reply brief, filed on November 13, 2018, is

19

deemed timely.

20
21
22

The parties pending cross-motions for summary judgment (Docs. 39, 45, and 49),
which are now fully briefed, will be addressed separately.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25

Dated: November 29, 2018
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1