Dominguez v. Masco Corporation

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/20/15 ORDERING that this Action is DISMISSED in its entirety as against all Defendants with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and ordered to binding arbitration pursuant to Defendants' Dispute Resolution policy, with each party to bear its own respective costs of suit and attorneys' fees.CASE CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4

SETH E. TILLMON, ESQ. (State Bar No. 246240)
Law Office of Seth E. Tillmon
10008 National Blvd., #115
Los Angeles, CA 90034
Telephone: [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff Carlos Dominguez

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

STEPHEN C. TEDESCO (State Bar No. 130325)
Littler Mendelson, P.C.
650 California Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: [phone]
BARBARA A. BLACKBURN (State Bar No. 253731)
Littler Mendelson, P.C.
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant Masco Corporation

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18

CARLOS DOMINGUEZ, an individual;

19
20
21

Plaintiff,
vs.

22

MASCO CORPORATION;

23

DOES 1 through 50, inclusive;

24
25

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 2:14-CV-02887-JAM-DAD
ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO
JUDGE JOHN MENDEZ
ORDER RE STIPULATION
VOLUNTARILY DISMISSING ENTIRE
ACTION
Complaint filed: October 20, 2014
(Sacramento County Superior Court)

26
27
28

1
Case No.: 2:14-CV-02887-JAM-DAD
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION VOLUNTARILY DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION

1

The Court, having read and considered the Stipulation of Plaintiff CARLOS

2

DOMINGUEZ (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant MASCO CORPORATION (“Defendant”)

3

(collectively, the “Parties”) to Voluntarily Dismiss the Entire Action Without Prejudice, and

4

good cause appearing,

5
6
7
8

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, the above-captioned action on file with the above-entitled Court in
Case No. 2:14-CV-02887-JAM-DAD is voluntarily dismissed in its entirety as against all
Defendants with prejudice and ordered to binding arbitration pursuant to Defendants’ Dispute

9
Resolution policy, with each party to bear its own respective costs of suit and attorneys’ fees.
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13
14

Dated: 2/20/2015

/s/ John A. Mendez______________________
HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ
U. S. District Court Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 2:14-CV-02887-JAM-DAD
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIPULATION VOLUNTARILY DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION