United States of America v. Farley et al

Filing 24

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.41(a)(1)(A)(ii), signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/3/15. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO Acting Assistant Attorney General 2 3 4 5 6 7 W. CARL HANKLA CHRISTIAN MEJIA Trial Attorneys, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0683 Telephone: (202) 307-6448 Telephone: (202) 305-7548 Facsimile: (202) 307-0054 Email: w.carl.hankla@usdoj.gov Email: Christian.Mejia@usdoj.gov 8 Attorneys for United States of America 9 10 11 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Eastern District of California Of Counsel 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) VIDA FARLEY and ) AJV BOOKKEEPING, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) Case No. 14-cv-02904-JAM-EFB ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 21 On November 3, 2015, the parties jointly submitted a Stipulation of Dismissal to the 22 Court. 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER (Case No. 14-cv-02904-JAM-EFB) 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Tax Division, Western Region P.O. Box 683 Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: 202-305-7548 1 Accordingly, the instant matter is dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 2 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the parties will bear their own respective costs and expenses, including any 3 attorneys’ fees. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED this 3rd day of November, 2015 8 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER (Case No. 14-cv-02904-JAM-EFB) 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Tax Division, Western Region P.O. Box 683 Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: 202-305-7548

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?