Gardner v. Bauer

Filing 12

ORDER AND ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/7/15: Within 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall pay the Clerk of Court monetary sanctions in the amount of $150.00 based on his failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute the case. Within 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DENNIS GARDNER,

12
13

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER AND

14
15
16

No. 2:14-cv-2908-KJM-KJN PS

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
JASON BAUER
Defendant.

17
18

Plaintiff Dennis Gardner, proceeding without counsel, commenced this action on

19

December 15, 2014. (ECF No. 1.) Thereafter, on December 19, 2014, the court granted

20

plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, screened plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28

21

U.S.C. § 1915, and directed that the complaint be served by the U.S. Marshal on defendant and

22

City of Vallejo police officer Jason Bauer. (ECF No. 3.) The court further ordered plaintiff,

23

within 30 days from the date that the order was filed, to provide the U.S. Marshal with all

24

necessary documents and information to effectuate service of process. (Id.)

25

That same day, the court also issued an “Order Setting Status Conference.” (ECF No. 5.)

26

The order directed plaintiff to “complete service of process on defendants named in the complaint

27

within 120 days from the date of this order. Plaintiff is cautioned that this action may be

28

dismissed if service of process is not accomplished within 120 days from the date that the
1

1

complaint is filed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).” (Id. at 1.) That same order set a status (pre-trial

2

scheduling) conference for May 7, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., and stated that “[a]ll parties shall appear

3

by counsel or in person if acting without counsel.” (Id. at 2.) The order also directed the parties

4

to file a status report addressing specific topics no later than seven (7) days prior to the status

5

conference. (Id. at 2-3.) The order specifically cautioned that “[f]ailing to obey federal or local

6

rules, or [an] order of this court, may result in dismissal of this action. This court will construe

7

pro se pleadings liberally, but pro se litigants must comply with the procedural rules.” (Id. at 3.)

8

Subsequently, on January 13, 2015, and January 22, 2015, plaintiff filed notices of

9

submission of documents, potentially suggesting that plaintiff had submitted a completed

10

summons form and a completed USM-285 form to the U.S. Marshal. (ECF Nos. 8, 9.) However,

11

the notices made no mention of the complaint or other service documents. In any event,

12

defendant has yet to appear in the case, and there has been no docket activity since January 2015.

13

Such inactivity strongly suggests that defendant was never served with process, even though the

14

120-day period for service of process has now expired. Indeed, upon an inquiry by the court to

15

the U.S. Marshal on May 4, 2015, the U.S. Marshal indicated that no service documents had been

16

received from plaintiff related to this case.

17

Finally, plaintiff failed to file a status report prior to the status conference and failed to

18

appear at the May 7, 2015 status conference in accordance with the court’s order. Given

19

plaintiff’s failures, the court has considered whether the case should be dismissed at this juncture.

20

Nevertheless, in light of plaintiff’s pro se status and the court’s desire to resolve the action on the

21

merits, the court first attempts lesser sanctions in the form of an order to show cause and

22

monetary sanctions. Because the court is cognizant that plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis,

23

the amount of monetary sanctions imposed is necessarily minimal.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. Within 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall pay the Clerk of Court monetary sanctions

26

in the amount of $150.00 based on his failure to comply with court orders and failure

27

to prosecute the case.

28

2. Within 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this action
2

1

should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) based on

2

plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute the case.

3

3. Failure to pay the monetary sanctions and respond to the order to show cause by the

4

required deadline may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to

5

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

6

4. Alternatively, if plaintiff is unable or no longer wishes to pursue the action at this

7

time, he may instead file a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action without

8

prejudice within 21 days of this order, in lieu of responding to the order to show cause

9

and paying the monetary sanctions outlined above.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 7, 2015

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3