Zamora v. Davis et al

Filing 3

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/19/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTHONY ZAMORA, Jr.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

No. 2:14-cv-2909 TLN DAD PS

ORDER

WILLIAM DAVIS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

By order signed April 30, 2015, plaintiff’s pro se complaint was dismissed and he was

18

granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. Plaintiff

19

was granted twenty-eight days from the date of the order to file an amended complaint and was

20

specifically cautioned that failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner may result in

21

a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty-eight day period has expired, and

22

plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner.1

23

/////

24

/////

25

/////

26

1

27
28

Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s copy of the April 30, 2015 order was
returned to the court as undeliverable, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s
responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local
Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
1

1
2
3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge

4

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

5

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

6

with the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to Magistrate

7

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within

8

the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Martinez v. Ylst,

9

951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

10

Dated: June 19, 2015

11
12
13
14
15

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.pro se\zamora2909.fta.f&rs.docx

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2