Niesen v. Garcia et al

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/12/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 8/8/16 Motion to Proceed IFP 35 is GRANTED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

THERESA MARIE NIESEN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

No. 2:14-cv-2921 WBS DB

v.

ORDER

L. GARCIA, YOLO COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; J. CEJA, YOLO
COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; J.
LAZARO, YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPUTY; M. NEVIS, YOLO COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPUTY; OFFICER
BIGELOW, ANIMAL CONTROL
OFFICER FOR YOLO COUNTY; YOLO
COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT;
YOLO COUNTY PROBATION
DEPARTMENT, and Does 1 through 50,
et al.,

21

Defendants.

22
23

Plaintiff, proceeding through counsel, commenced this action on December 16, 2014, by

24

filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (Dkt. No. 1.) On July 12, 2016, judgment

25

was entered. (Dkt. No. 31.) On August 8, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma

26

pauperis. (Dkt. No. 35.) That same day the assigned District Judge referred to the undersigned

27

the resolution of plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. No. 36.)

28

/////
1

1
2
3

The undersigned finds that plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application makes the showing
required by the statute.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s August 8, 2016 motion to

4

proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 35) is granted.

5

Dated: August 12, 2016

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1

DLB:6
Ddb1\orders.civil\niesen2912.ifp.ord

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3