Chaffins v. Ferrara

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/15/2015 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY CHAFFINS, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2924-EFB P v. ORDER TOMAS A. FERRARA, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a former county prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus 17 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to petitioner’s consent. 20 See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4). On March 12, 2015, the court found that petitioner had failed to file an in forma pauperis 21 22 application or pay the filing fee ($5.00) required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) & 1915(a). 23 Accordingly, the court ordered petitioner to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay 24 the filing fee within 30 days. That order warned petitioner that failure to do so may result in this 25 action being dismissed. 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 2 3 4 The 30-day period has expired and petitioner has not filed a completed in forma pauperis affidavit, paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order.1 Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. Dated: April 15, 2015. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 27 28 Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the order was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?