Gutierrez Ramirez v. Unknown
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/29/2014 TRANSFERRING this matter to the USDC for the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K) Modified on 12/30/2014 (Yin, K).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NOE GABRIEL GUTIERREZ RAMIREZ,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:14-cv-2934 KJN P
v.
ORDER
UNKNOWN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not filed an application to proceed in forma
19
pauperis or paid the filing fee.
Petitioner is presently incarcerated at the Correctional Training Facility in Monterey
20
21
County. He is serving a sentence for a conviction rendered by the Los Angeles County Superior
22
Court.
The general rule with regard to habeas applications is that both the United States District
23
24
Court in the district where petitioner was convicted and the District Court where petitioner is
25
incarcerated have jurisdiction over the claims. See Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S.
26
484 (1973). In the instant case, petitioner's conviction occurred in an area covered by the District
27
Court for the Central District of California.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is
2
transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Id. at 499
3
n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).
4
Dated: December 29, 2014
5
6
rami2934.108a
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?