Gutierrez Ramirez v. Unknown

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/29/2014 TRANSFERRING this matter to the USDC for the Central District of California. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K) Modified on 12/30/2014 (Yin, K).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NOE GABRIEL GUTIERREZ RAMIREZ, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:14-cv-2934 KJN P v. ORDER UNKNOWN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not filed an application to proceed in forma 19 pauperis or paid the filing fee. Petitioner is presently incarcerated at the Correctional Training Facility in Monterey 20 21 County. He is serving a sentence for a conviction rendered by the Los Angeles County Superior 22 Court. The general rule with regard to habeas applications is that both the United States District 23 24 Court in the district where petitioner was convicted and the District Court where petitioner is 25 incarcerated have jurisdiction over the claims. See Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 26 484 (1973). In the instant case, petitioner's conviction occurred in an area covered by the District 27 Court for the Central District of California. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is 2 transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Id. at 499 3 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 4 Dated: December 29, 2014 5 6 rami2934.108a 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?